Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:52:27.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inherent Buffer-layer Formation on Chalcopyrite Absorbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Christian Pettenkofer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, E-I4, Berlin, Germany
Andreas Hofmann
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum berlin, E-I4, Berlin, Germany
Carsten Lehmann
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum berlin, E-I4, Berlin, Germany
Alexandra Dombrowa
Affiliation:
[email protected], Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, E-I4, Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We report on epitaxial growth of ZnO on polycrystalline and (112) orientated CuInS2 and CuInSe2 thin films. Step-by-step growth and investigation by photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) and low energy electron diffraction (LEED) provided information on the growth mode and the electronic structure of the ZnO-CuInS2-interface. During the initial growth no ZnO is deposited. Instead a monolayer of ZnS is formed by depletion the CuInS2 surface of excess sulfur. Thereafter, the ZnO growth starts on the ZnS buffer layer. The band alignment derived from PES shows that the ZnS buffer layer is thin enough to provide a beneficial band alignment for photovoltaic applications. CuInSe2 (112) samples showed a similar behaviour, but at the chosen deposition temperature of 450°C only ZnSe growth is detected. At lower temperatures ZnO growth on top of ZnSe is observed. XPEEM experiments show an inhomogeneous interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Löher, T., Jaegermann, W. Pettenkofer, C.; J. Appl. Phys, 77, 1994, 734 Google Scholar
2 Andres, S. Pettenkofer, C. Speck, F. Seyller, T., J. Appl. Phys. 103, 2008, 103720 Google Scholar
3 Hunger, R. Pettenkofer, C. Scheer, R. Surf. Sci. 477, 20 2001, 76 Google Scholar
4 Calvet, W. Pettenkofer, C. Lewerenz, H-J., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. 21, 2003, 1335 Google Scholar
5 Calvet, W. Lehmann, C. Plake, T. Pettenkofer, C. Thin Solid Films, 480-481, 2005, 347 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.090Google Scholar
6 Andres, S. Lehmann, C. Pettenkofer, C. Thin Solid Films, 2009 doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.0 2009.03.235 3.235Google Scholar
7 Sadewasser, S., Bremsteller, W. Plake, T. Kaufmann, C.A. and Pettenkofer, Ch., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. 2008 Google Scholar