Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:18.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Interface Disorder on the Raman Response of {113}-Oriented Superlattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Pedro Castrillo ,
Luciano Colombo  and
Gaspar Armelles
Pedro Castrillo
Affiliation:
Sezione di Fisica dei Solidi e Nuovi Materiali, Université degli studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy Centro Nacional de MicroelectrÓnica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientfficas, Serrano 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Luciano Colombo
Affiliation:
Sezione di Fisica dei Solidi e Nuovi Materiali, Université degli studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
Gaspar Armelles
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de MicroelectrÓnica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientfficas, Serrano 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the effect of interface cationic intermixing on the Raman scattering by optical phonons in {113}-oriented superlattices. The theoretical Raman spectra have been calculated using the Bond Charge Model (for lattice dynamics) and the Bond Polarizability Model (for the Raman intensities). We have compared the theoretical results with our experimental data in the spectral range of GaAs-like optical modes. Finally, we have studied the differences between the effect of interface disorder and the effect of the periodic interface corrugation proposed in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 326: Symposium M – Growth, Processing, and Characterization of Semiconductor Heterostructures , 1993 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jusserand, B. and Mollot, F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 61, 423 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Jusserand, B., Mollot, F., Moison, J. and Le Roux, G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 560 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Popovic, Z. V., Cardona, M., Richter, E., Strauch, D., Tapfer, L. and Ploog, K., Phys. Rev. B, 40, 1207 (1989); Phys. Rev. B, 40, 3040 (1989); Phys. Rev. B, 43, 4925 (1991).Google Scholar
4 R.Nötzel, , Ledentsov, N.N., Däweritz, L., Hohenstein, M. and Ploog, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3812 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Weber, W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 33, 371 (1974).Google Scholar
6 Rustagi, K. C. and Weber, W., Solid State Commun., 18, 673 (1976).Google Scholar
7 Miglio, L. and Colombo, L., Superlattices and Microstruct.,7 139 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Castrillo, P., Miglio, L. and Armelles, G.. To be published.Google Scholar
9 Maradudin, A. A. and Burnstein, E., Phys. Rev. 164, 1081 (1967).Google Scholar
10 Briones, F., González, L. and Ruiz, A., Appl. Phys. A 49, 729 (1989).Google Scholar