Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:09:00.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Growth Conditions on Phase Separation of InGaN Bulk Material Grown by MOCVD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yong Huang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 778 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30332-0250, United States
Omkar Jani
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Eun Hyun Park
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Ian Ferguson
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Get access

Abstract

Different types of phase separation in thick InGaN layers were studied using photoluminescence (PL) and x-ray diffraction (XRD). InGaN films of 100 nm in thickness were grown on 2 μm GaN templates with an In molar fraction ranging from 0% to 20% by metal organic chemical phase deposition (MOCVD). It is shown that suppression of the phase separation in InGaN can be made possible by increasing the TMIn flow rate, decreasing the layer thickness and decreasing the growth rate. Based on the results, two types of phase separation, microscopic quantum dots and macroscopic domains, are proposed accordingly. The influence of the growth conditions on each type is summarized respectively in this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ho, I. and Stringfellow, G. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2701 (1996).Google Scholar
2. O'Donnell, K. P., Martin, R. W., and Middleton, P. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 237 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Chen, H., Feenstra, R. M., Northrup, J. E., Zywietz, T., Neugebauer, J., and Greve, D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18, 2884 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Shiojiri, M., Chuo, C. C., Hsu, J. T., Yang, J. R., and Saijo, H., J. Appl. Phys. 99, 073505 (2006).Google Scholar
5. Chen, H., Feenstra, R. M., Northrup, J. E., Zywietz, T., and Neugebauer, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1902 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Park, I. K., Kwon, M. K., Baek, S. H., Ok, Y. W., Seong, T. Y., Park, S. J., Kim, Y. S., Moon, Y. T., and Kim, D. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 061906, (2005).Google Scholar