Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:41.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Cavities and Point Defects on Cu Gettering and B'Diffusion in Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Wong-Leung
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
J. S. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
M. Petravić
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Cavities, formed in Si by hydrogen implantation and subsequent annealing, can provide ideal gettering sites for metal impurities. In this study, we have observed large differences in the accumulation of Cu at cavities depending on whether Cu was introduced into Si during cavity formation or into wafers with pre-formed cavities. The observed behaviour is consistent with a high flux of Si interstitials emitted during cavity formation which induce the dissolution of Cu3Si and the enhanced transport of Cu to cavities. In further studies, boron implantation was carried out into wafers containing pre-formed cavities and transient enhanced diffusion (TED) of boron was suppressed duringsubsequent annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, California, The National Technology Roadmapfor Semiconductors 1994.Google Scholar
[2] Myers, S. M., Follstaedt, D. M., and Bishop, D. M., Mat. Sci. For. 143–147, 1635 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Myers, S. M., Follstaedt, D. M., and Bishop, D. M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 316, 33 (1994).Google Scholar
[4] Follstaedt, D. M. and Myers, S. M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 316, 27 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Myers, S. M. and Follstaedt, D. M., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 1337 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Wong-Leung, J., Ascheron, C. E., Petravić, M., Elliman, R. G., and Williams, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1231 (1995).Google Scholar
[7] Wong-Leung, J., Nygren, E., and Williams, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 416 (1995).Google Scholar
[8] Eaglesham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H. J., Haynes, T. E., and Poate, J. M., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B 106, 191 (1995).Google Scholar
[9] Follstaedt, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1116 (1993).Google Scholar
[10] Ronay, M. and Schad, R. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2042 (1990).Google Scholar
[11] Wong-Leung, J. and Williams, J. S., to be submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett., 1997.Google Scholar
[12] Raineri, V. and Campisano, S. U., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 120, 56 (1996).Google Scholar