Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:42:44.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Cationic Interactions on Fatty Acid Monolayers Studied by Ellipsometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Mahn Won Kim ,
Bryan B. Sauer ,
Hyuk Yu ,
Mehran Yazdanian  and
George Zografi
Mahn Won Kim
Affiliation:
Exxon Research and Engineering Co. Annandale, NJ 08801
Bryan B. Sauer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Hyuk Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Mehran Yazdanian
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
George Zografi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Get access

Abstract

Optical properties of fatty acid monolayers were measured as a function of surface density and under the influence of cations in the aqueous substrate. The monolayer behavior of pentadecanoic acid (C15) on an aqueous solution of HCl at pH=2.0 was studied. The change in the ellipsometric phase angle δΔ was mildly affected by increases in surface density at constant orientation but strongly influenced by the liquid-expanded/solid phase transition presumably due to a change in conformation.

The increase in the ellipsometric phase angle 6Δ with chain length C15, C16, C18, and C22 was attributed to an increase in thickness of fatty acids at the air/water interface. Separating the effect of optical density of head groups, the refractive indices calculated from the chain length data were independent of ionic environment. The magnitude of δΔ for fatty acids on aqueous substrates increased in the order HCl, CdCl2, and PbCl2. This was due to an increase in the refractive index of fatty acid head groups caused by association of divalent cations. Ellipsometry was also found to be a useful technique to monitor in-situ the degree of divalent cation association.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 177: Symposium V – Macromolecular Liquids , 1989 , 405
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Gaines, G.L. “Insoluble Monolayers at an Air-Water Interface”; Wiley, New York: 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Ellis, J.W.; Pauley, J.L. J. Coll. Sci. 1964, 19, 755.Google Scholar
[3] Petrov, J.G.; Kuleff, I.; Platikanov, D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1982, 88, 29.Google Scholar
[4] Richardson, R.M.; Roser, S.J. Liquid Crystals 1987, 2, 797.Google Scholar
[5] Yazdanian, M. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1988.Google Scholar
[6] Pallas, N.R., Pethica, B.A. Langmuir, 1985 1, 509.Google Scholar
[7] Rasing, Th.; Hsiung, H.; Shen, Y.R.; Kim, M.W. Phys. Rev. A, Rapid Comm., 1988 37, 2732.Google Scholar
[8] Kim, M.W., Sauer, B.B.; Yu, H.; Yazdanian, M.; Zografi, G. Langmuir, in Press, 1990.Google Scholar
[9] Azzam, R.M. A; Bashara, N.M. “Ellipsometry and Polarized Light”; North Holland Publishing Co.: New York, NY, 1977.Google Scholar
[10] Sauer, B.B.; Yu, H.; Yazdanian, M.; Zografi, G.; Kim, M.W. Macromolecules 1989 22, 2332.Google Scholar
[11] Drude, P. Ann. Phys. 1889, 36, 532.Google Scholar
[12] den Engelsen, D.; de Koning, B.R., J.C.S. Faraday I 1974, 70, 1603.Google Scholar
[13] Grundy, M.J.; Richardson, R.M.; Roser, S.J.; Penfold, J.; Ward, R.C. Thin Solid Films 1988, 159, 43.Google Scholar
[14] Pomerantz, M.; Segmuller, A. Thin Solid Films 1985, 134, 1.Google Scholar
[15] “Polymer Handbook”; Brandrup, J., Immergut, E.H., Eds. Wiley: NY, 1975.Google Scholar
[16] Blodgett, K.B.; Langmuir, I. Phys. Rev. 1937, 51, 964.Google Scholar
[17] den Engelsen, D. J. Opt. Soc.7Am. 1971, 61, 1460.Google Scholar