Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:49:38.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Average Free Volume Element Size on the Transport of Gases Through Polymers With Equivalent Total Free Volumes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Broderick R. Wilks ,
Won J. Chung ,
Peter J. Ludovice ,
Mary E. Rezac ,
Pavla Meakin  and
Anita J. Hill
Broderick R. Wilks
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332
Won J. Chung
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332
Peter J. Ludovice
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332
Mary E. Rezac
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
Pavla Meakin
Affiliation:
CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology, Private Bag 33 South Clayton MDC 3169, Victoria Australia and School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Anita J. Hill
Affiliation:
CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology, Private Bag 33 South Clayton MDC 3169, Victoria Australia and School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The permeability coefficients of gases through glassy polymers have been correlated with the fractional free volume (FFV) of the polymers. In general, polymers with high fractional free volumes have high permeabilities while those with low FFV have low permeabilities. This observation is valid for many, but not all materials. This study evaluates the impact of the average size of a free volume element on the permeability of gases through the polymer.

Evaluation of the influence of average free volume element size is only possible by employing model systems in which the chemistry and the total free volume are essentially equivalent. In this study, two stereochemical forms of a methyl-substituted polynorbornene were employed. The isomers are chemically equivalent, with similar total free volumes (0.181 versus 0.188). The average defect size was probed using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. The ortho-positronium lifetimes were measured and it was determined that the difference between the two isomers was approximately 10% with the lower-FFV isomer having the larger average lifetime. For simplicity, the two isomers will be termed Pd and Ni (in reference to the catalysts used in their preparation). The Pd isomer has a slightly lower FFV, but larger average defect size. The Ni isomer has a higher FFV, but smaller average defect size.

Transport evaluation indicates that the Pd-isomer has gas permeabilities two to three times those of the Ni-isomer. In depth analysis indicates that the increase in permeability is a result of an increase in both the diffusivity of gases through the polymer and gas solubility.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 752: Symposium AA – Membranes–Preparation, Properties and Applications , 2002 , AA7.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Meredith, J.; Karim, A.; Amis, E. MRS Bulletin 2002, 27 4: 330 - 335.Google Scholar
2. Zimmerman, C. M.; Singh, A.; Koros, W. J. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 137: 145–154.Google Scholar
3. Park, J. Y.; Paul, D. R. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 125: 23–39.Google Scholar
4. Koros, W. J.; Coleman, M. R.; Walker, D. R. B. Annual Review of Material Science 1992, 22: 47–89.Google Scholar
5. Goodall, B. L.; Benedikt, G. M.; Mcintosh, L. H. III; Barnes, D. A.; Medina, D. A., Process for Making Polymers Containing a Norbornene Repeating Unit by Addition Polymerization using an Organo (Nickel or Palladium) Complex. 1995, 5, 468, 819: U. S. Patent.Google Scholar
6. Goodall, B. L.; Benedikt, G. M.; Mcintosh-III, L. H.; Barnes, D. A.; Rhodes, L. F., Addition Polymers Derived from Norbornene-Functional Monomers and Process Therefor. 1996, 5, 571, 881: U. S. Patent.Google Scholar
7. Ahmed, S.; Bidstrup, S. A.; Kohl, P.; Ludovice, P. J. Makromol Chem, Macromol Symp 1998, 133: 1–10.Google Scholar
8. Ahmed, S.; Kohl, P.; Ludovice, P. J. J Comp and Theor Polym Sci 2000, 10: 221–233.Google Scholar
9. Barnes, D. A.; Benedikt, G. M.; Goodall, B. L.; Huang, S.; Kalamarides, H. A.; Lenhard, S.; McIntosh, L. H. III; Selvy, K. T.; Shick, R. A.; Rhodes, L. F. J Amer Chem Soc submitted.Google Scholar
10. Barnes, D. A.; Benedikt, G. M.; Goodall, B. L.; McIntosh, L. H. III; Shick, R. A.; Rhodes, L. F. J Amer Chem Soc submitted.Google Scholar
11. Walker, D. R. B.; Koros, W. J. Journal of Membrane Science 1991, 55: 99–117.Google Scholar
12. Kim, T. H.; Koros, W. J.; Husk, G. R.; O'brien, K. C. Journal of Membrane Science 1988, 37: 45–62.Google Scholar
13. Stern, S. A.; Mi, Y.; Yamamoto, H. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics 1989, 27: 1887–1909.Google Scholar
14. Coleman, M. R.; Koros, W. J. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics 1994, 32: 1915–1926.Google Scholar
15. Yamamoto, H.; Mi, Y.; Stern, S. A. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics 1990, 28: 2291–2304.Google Scholar
16. Stern, S. A.; Liu, Y.; Feld, W. A. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics 1993, 31: 939–951.Google Scholar
17. Langsam, M.; Burgoyne, W. F. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry 1993, 31: 909–921.Google Scholar
18. McHattie, J. S.; Koros, W. J.; Paul, D. R. Polymer 1991, 32: 840–850.Google Scholar
19. Aitken, C. L.; Koros, W. J.; Paul, D. R. Macromolecules 1992, 25: 3651–3658.Google Scholar
20. Bixler, H. J.; Sweeting, O. J., Barrier Properties of Polymer Films, in The Science and Technology of Polymer Films, Sweeting, O. J., Editor. 1971, Wiley-Interscience: New York. p. 1–130.Google Scholar