Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:32:25.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indium Ion Doping During Si Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

N. Hirashita
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, the Coordinated Science Laboratory, and the Materials Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 61801, USA
J.-P. Noel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, the Coordinated Science Laboratory, and the Materials Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 61801, USA
A. Rockett
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, the Coordinated Science Laboratory, and the Materials Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 61801, USA
L. Markert
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, the Coordinated Science Laboratory, and the Materials Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 61801, USA
J.E. Greene
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, the Coordinated Science Laboratory, and the Materials Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 61801, USA
M.A. flasan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University., S-58183 Linköping., Sweden
J. Knall
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University., S-58183 Linköping., Sweden
W.-X. Ni
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University., S-58183 Linköping., Sweden
J.-E. Sundgren
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University., S-58183 Linköping., Sweden
Get access

Abstract

A single-grid UHV-compatible ion source was used to provide partially-ionized accelerated In+ dopant beams during Si growth by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Indium incorporation probabilities in 800 °C MBE Si(100). as measured by secondary ion mass spectrometry, ranged from < 10−5 (the detection limit) for thermal In to values of 0.02–0.7 for In+ acceleration energies EIn, between 50 and 400 eV. Temperature-dependent Hall-effect and resistivity measurements were carried out on Si films grown at 800 °C with EIn = 200 eV. Indium was incorporated substitutionally in electrically active sites over the entire concentration range examined. 1016— 1019 cm−3, with an acceptor level ionization energy of 165 meV. The 111 meV level associated with In-C complexes and the 18 meV “supershallow” level reported for In ion-implanted Si were not observed. Roomtemperature hole mobilities μ were higher than both annealed In-ion-implanted Si and Irvin's values for bulk Si. Phonon scattering was found to dominate at temperatures between 100 and 330 K and μ varied as T−22.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Greene., J.E. Barnett, S.A.. Rockett, A.. and Bajor, G.. Appl. Surf. Sci. 22/23. 520 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Ota, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 51. 1102 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Bajor, G. and Greene, J.lF.. J. Appl. Phys. 54. 1579 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Hasan, M.-A.. Knall, J.. Barnett, S.A., Rockett, A., Sundgren, J.-E., and Greene, J.E.. unpublished.Google Scholar
5. Rockett, A.. Knall, J., Hasan, M.A.. Sundgren, J.-F., Barnett, S.A.. and Greene, J.. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4. 900 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Thomas, R.N.. Braggins, T.T.. Hobgood, H.M., and Takei, W.J.. J. Appl. Phys. 49. 2811 (1978).Google Scholar
7. Baron, R., Baukus, J.P., Allen, S.D., McGill, T.C., Young, M.H.. Kimura. II, H., Winston, V.. and Marsh, O.J.. Appl. Phys. Liett. 34. 257 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Cerofolini, G.F., Pignatel, G.U., Mazzega, E., and Ottavini, G., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2204 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Cerofolini, G.F., Ferla, G., Pignatel, G.U., and Riva, F., Thin Solid Films 101, 2204 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationship in Science and Technology, Group B, Vol.17, Semiconductors, eds. O., Madelung, M., Schulz and H., Weiss (Springer, Berlin, 1984).Google Scholar
11. Knall, J.. Sundgren, J.-E., Hansson, G.V., and Greene, J.E., Surf. Sci. 166, 512 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Rockett, A., Barnett, S.A., and Greene, J.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2, 306 (1984).Google Scholar
13. van der Pauw, L.J., Philips Res. Repts. 13, 1 (1958).Google Scholar
14. Barnett, S.A., Winters, H.F., and Greene, J.E., Surf. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
15. Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons 1981).Google Scholar
16. Schroder, I.K., Braggins, T.T., and Hllobgood, H.M., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5256 (1978).Google Scholar
17. Parker, G.J., Brotherton, S.D.. Gale, I., and Gill, A., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3926 (1983).Google Scholar
18. Lin, J.F., Li, S.S., Linares, L.C., and Teng, K.W., Solid State Electronics 24, 827 (1981).Google Scholar
19. Blakemore, J.S., Semiconductor Statistics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1962).Google Scholar
20. Lang, J.E., Madarasz, F.L., and Hemenger, P.M., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3612 (1983).Google Scholar
21. Kubiak, R.A.A., Leong, W.Y., and Parker, E.H.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 592 (1985).Google Scholar
22. Onton, A., Fisher, P.. and Ramdas, A.K., Phys. Rev. 163, 686 (1967).Google Scholar
23. Backenstoss, G., Phys. Rev. 108, 1416 (1957).Google Scholar
24. Sze, S.M. and Irvin, J.C., Solid-State Electronics 11, 599 (1968): and D.M. Caughey and R.E. Thomas, Proc. IEEE 55, 2192 (1967).Google Scholar
25. Li, S.S., Solid-State Electronics 21, 1109 (1978).Google Scholar
26. Thurber, W.R., Mattis, R.L., Liu, Y.M., and Fillibean, J.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 127, 2291 (1980).Google Scholar