Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:52:24.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indentation Fracture Toughness Measurements of Low Dielectric Constant Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dylan J. Morris  and
Robert F. Cook
Dylan J. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455U.S.A.
Robert F. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The physics and mechanics of a fracture toughness measurement technique for low-k films are described. It has been observed experimentally that it is possible to generate reproducible stable cracks at indentation sites in thin low-k films using cube-corner indentation. The fracture response depends on the film thickness and follows no simple scaling laws. The physics of a model that takes into account the stress fields from indentation and film stress, with particular attention paid to the Poisson's ratio of the film, are described. The model is able to predict the changes in observables when the film thickness is changed, which allows one to estimate film toughness independent of the configuration of the material.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 766: Symposium E – Materials, Technology and Reliability for Advanced Interconnects and Low-k Dielectrics - 2003 , 2003 , E9.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lucas, B.N. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., 436, p. 233, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Lucas, B.N., Oliver, W. C., and Swindeman, J.E., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., 522, p. 3, 1998.Google Scholar
3. Anstis, G. R. et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, p. 533, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Arora, A., Marshall, D.B., Lawn, B.R., and Swain, M.V., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 31, p. 415, 1979 Google Scholar
5. Pharr, G.M., Harding, D.S., and Oliver, W.C., Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Materials Having Ultra-Fine Microstructures, p. 449, 1993.Google Scholar
6. Morris, D.J. and Cook, R.F., unpublished work.Google Scholar
7. Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mat. Res 14, p. 2296, 1999.Google Scholar
8. Yoffe, E. H., Phil. Mag. A 46, p. 617, 1982.Google Scholar
9. Chiang, S. S., Marshall, D. B., and Evans, A. G., J. App. Phys. 53, p. 298, 1982.Google Scholar
10. Evans, K.E. and Alderson, A., Phys. Rev. Lett 89, p.225503, 2002.Google Scholar
11. Evans, K.E., Nkansh, M.A., and Hutchinson, I.J., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, p. 1289, 1994.Google Scholar
12. Lawn, B.R., Evans, A.G., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, p. 574, 1980.Google Scholar
13. Mencik, J. et al., J. Mater. Res. 12, p. 2475, 1997.Google Scholar
14. Beuth, J.L. Jr , Int. J. Solids. Struct. 29, p. 1657, 1992.Google Scholar
15. Dundurs, J., J. Appl. Mech. 36, p. 650, 1969.Google Scholar
16. Zak, A.R. and Williams, M.L., J. Appl. Mech. 30, p. 142, 1963.Google Scholar
17. Suga, T., Elssner, E., and Schmander, S., J. Comp. Mater. 22, p. 917, 1988.Google Scholar
18. Tada, H., Paris, P. C., and Irwin, G. R., The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, ASME Press, 2000.Google Scholar