Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:03:57.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasing the Lateral Resolution of Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

R.J. Kline ,
J.F. Richards  and
P.E. Russell
R.J. Kline
Affiliation:
Analytical Instruments Facility, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 Materials Technology Department, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
J.F. Richards
Affiliation:
Materials Technology Department, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
P.E. Russell
Affiliation:
Analytical Instruments Facility, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses problems inherent to scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM) and ways to correct them to increase the resolution of two-dimensional dopant profiling. Specifically this paper looks into issues related to the probe-silicon contact and the damaged surface layer created by the sample preparation technique. Degradation of the measured dopant profile was observed when the probe scanned over the nitride spacers. Attempts to reduce the required contact pressures to increase the lifetime and effectiveness of the probes are addressed. The force required for SSRM was successfully reduced after the damage layer was partially removed by isotropic etching.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 610: Symposium B – Si Front End Processing - Physics & Technology..II , 2000 , B2.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, CA (1998)Google Scholar
2.“Status and review of 2-D carrier profiling using scanning probe microscopy,” Wolf, De, , Stephenson, , Trenkler, , Clarysse, , Hantschel, and , Vandervorst. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18 (1), (2000) 361–368 10.1116/1.591198Google Scholar
3.“Characterization of arsenic dose loss at the Si/SiO2 interface,” , Kasnavi, , Sun, , Mo, , Pianetta, , Griffin, and , Plummer. J. Appl. Phys. 87 (5), (2000) 2255–2260 10.1063/1.372169Google Scholar
4.“Characterization of a point-contact on silicon using force microscopy-supported resistance measurements,” Wolf, De, , Snauwaert, , Clarysse, Vandervorst, and , Hellemans. Appl. Phys. Lett 66 (12), (1995) 1530–1532 10.1063/1.113636Google Scholar
5. Jones, F. Llewilyn, The Physics of Electrical Contacts Oxford University Press (1957)Google Scholar
6. Sharvin, Yu. V.. Sov. Phys. JETP 21, (1965) 655–656 Google Scholar