Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:49:31.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ X-ray and neutron powder diffraction study of LaNi5-x Snx–H systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yumiko Nakamura
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST Central 5, 1–1–1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305–8565, Japan
Robert C. Bowman Jr
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Mail Stop 79–24, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109–8099, USA
Etsuo Akiba
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST Central 5, 1–1–1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305–8565, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We have studied structural change and lattice strain formation during absorption and desorption of hydrogen (deuterium) by high purity LaNi5-x Snx alloys (x = 0.22, 0.25) using in situ X-ray and neutron diffraction along with simultaneously measuring the P-C isotherms. From profile analysis of the X-ray diffraction data, lattice parameter and lattice strain in each hydriding state are evaluated. In situ neutron diffraction data provided hydrogen occupation changing with hydrogen content. Significant lattice contract and strain formation were observed in the hydride phase in desorption. This behavior was related with decrease in hydrogen occupation in the hydride phase revealed from the neutron diffraction data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. van Vucht, J.H.N, Kuijpers, F.A., Bruning, H.C.A.M., Philip Res. Rept. 25 (1970) 133.Google Scholar
2. Notten, P.H.L., Einerhand, R.E.F. and Daams, J.L.C, J. Alloys Comp., 231 (1995) 604.Google Scholar
3. Nakamura, Y. and Akiba, E., J. Alloys Compd. 308, 309 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Bowman, R.C. Jr, J. Alloys Compd., 356–357, 789 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Bowman, R.C. Jr, Lindensmith, C.A., Luo, S., Flanagan, Ted B., Vogt, T., J. Alloys Compd., 330–332, 271 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Lambert, S.W., Chandra, D., Cathey, W.N., Lynch, F. E., Bowman, R.C. Jr, J. Alloys Compd., 187, 113 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Bowman, R.C. Jr., Luo, C.H., Ahn, C.C., Witham, C.K., Fultz, B., J. Alloys Compd., 217, 185 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Goodell, P.D., J. Less-Common Met., 99, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Nakamura, Y., Oguro, K., Uehara, I., Akiba, E., Int. J. Hydrogen energy, 25, 531 (2000)Google Scholar
10. Nakamura, Y., Ishigaki, T., Kamiyama, T., Akiba, E., J. Alloys Compd. 384, 195 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Izumi, F., “Rietveld analysis program RIETAN and PREMOS and special applications” The Rietveld Method, ed. Young, R. A. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1993) pp.236253.Google Scholar
13. Larson, A.C. and Von Dreele, R.B., “GSAS-General Structure Analysis System,” Report No. LAUR 86748, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1994).Google Scholar
14. Joubert, J.-M., Latroche, M., Cerny, R., Bowman, R.C. Jr, Percheron-Guegan, A., and Yvon, K., J. Alloys Compds. 293–295, 124 (1999).Google Scholar