Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:45:31.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ XAFS of the LixNi0.8Co0.2O2 Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. J. Kropf
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL, 60439
C. S. Johnson
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL, 60439
Get access

Abstract

The layered LiNi0.8AsCo0.2O2 system is being considered as a new cathode material for the lithium-ion battery. Compared with LiCoO2, the standard cathode formulation, it possesses improved electrochemical performance at a projected lower cost. In situ x-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy (XAFS) measurements were conducted on a cell cycled at a moderate rate and normal Li-ion operating voltages (3.0-4.1 V). The XAFS data collected at the Ni and Co edges approximately every 30 min. revealed details about the response of the cathode to Li insertion and extraction. These measurements on the LixNi0.8AsCo0.2O2 cathode (0.29<×<0.78) demonstrated the excellent reversibility of the cathode's short-range structure. However, the Co and Ni atoms behaved differently in response to Li insertion. This study corroborates previous work that explains the XAFS of the Ni atoms in terms of a Ni3+ Jahn-Teller ion. An analysis of the metal-metal distances suggests, contrary to a qualitative analysis of the x-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), that the Co3+ is oxidized to the maximum extent possible (within the Li content range of this experiment) at x = 0.47 ± 0.04, and further oxidation occurs at the Ni site.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Riemers, J.N. and Dahn, J.R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 2091 (1992).10.1149/1.2221184Google Scholar
[2] Saadoune, Y. and Delmas, C., J. Mater. Chem. 6, 193 (1996).10.1039/JM9960600193Google Scholar
[3] Kostov, S., Wang, Y., denBoer, M. L., Greenbaum, S., Chang, C. C., and Kumpta, P. N., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 496, 427434 (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Pickering, J., George, G. N., Lewandowski, J. T., and Jacobson, A. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 41374144 (1993).10.1021/ja00063a035Google Scholar
[5] Nakai, I. and Nakagome, T., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 1 (6), 259261 (1998).10.1149/1.1390705Google Scholar
[6] Mansour, A. N., McBreen, J., and Melendres, C. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 146 (8), 27992809 (1999).10.1149/1.1392011Google Scholar
[7] O'Grady, W. E., Pandya, K. I., Swider, K. E., and Corrigan, D. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 16131616 (1996).10.1149/1.1836687Google Scholar
[8] Sun, X., Yang, Q., McBreen, J., Gao, Y., Yakovleva, M. V., Xing, X. K., and Daroux, M. L., submitted to 1999 Joint International Meeting of the Electrochemical Society and the Electrochemical Society of Japan (1999).Google Scholar
[9] Rougier, A., Delmas, C., and Chadwick, A. V., Solid State Comm. 94 (2), 123127 (1995).10.1016/0038-1098(95)00020-8Google Scholar
[10] The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in 50 vol. % ethylene carbonate (EC) and 50 vol. % dimethyl carbonate (DMC) obtained as a solution from Merck Company.Google Scholar
[11] Zabinsky, S. I., Rehr, J. J., Ankudinov, A., Albers, R. C., and Eller, M. J., Phys. Rev. B 52, 2995 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevB.52.2995Google Scholar
[12] Stern, E. A., Newville, M., Ravel, B., Yacoby, Y., and Haskel, D., Physica B 208&209, 117 (1995).10.1016/0921-4526(94)00826-HGoogle Scholar