Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:22:05.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Situ Monitoring of Anodic Oxide Growth on SI (001) by Interface Second-Harmonic Generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Janz  and
J. A. Bardwell
S. Janz
Affiliation:
Institute for Microstructural Sciences, National Research Council Canada, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, KIA 0R6.
J. A. Bardwell
Affiliation:
Institute for Microstructural Sciences, National Research Council Canada, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, KIA 0R6.
Get access

Abstract

Optical second-harmonic (SH) generation is used to monitor the anodic growth of oxide on a (001) Si surface. The measured SH intensity is dominated by the nonlinear optical response of the space charge region in the Si just below the Si/oxide interface. The interface SH technique can detect the onset of H desorption, identify the flat band potential, and probe the evolution of space charge within the growing oxide layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 502: Symposium II – In Situ Process Diagnostics & Intelligent Materials Processing , 1997 , 59
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bardwell, J. A., Draper, N., and Schmuki, P., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 8761 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Scofield, C. J. and Stoneham, A. M., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 10, 215 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Mott, N. F., Rigo, S., Rochet, F., and Stoneham, A. M., Phil. Mag. B 60, 189 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Chazalviel, J. N., Electrochimica Acta 37, 865 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Wolters, D. R. and Duijnhoven, A. T. A. Zegers-van, J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 241 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Daum, W., Krause, H. J., Reichel, U., and Ibach, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1234 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Dadap, J. I., Hu, X. F., Anderson, M. H., Downer, M. C., Lowell, J. K., and Aktsipetrov, O. A., Phys. Rev. B 53, R7607 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Bloch, J., Mihaychuk, J. G., and Drie, H. M. vanl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 920 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Sipe, J. E., Moss, D. J., and Driel, H. M. van, Phys. Rev. B 35, 1129 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Aktsipetrov, O. A., Fedyanin, A. A., Dadap, J. I., and Downer, M. C., Laser Physics 6, 1142 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Daschbach, J. L., Fischer, P. R., Dragson, D. E., Demarest, D., and Richmond, G. L., J. Chem, Phys. 99, 3240 (1995).Google Scholar