Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:40:26.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impurity Characterization of Solar Wind Collectors for the Genesis Discovery Mission by Resonance Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

W. F. Calaway ,
M. P. McCann  and
M. J. Pellin
W. F. Calaway
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
M. P. McCann
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
M. J. Pellin
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

NASA's Genesis Discovery Mission is designed to collect solar matter and return it to earth for analysis. The mission consists of launching a spacecraft that carries high purity collector materials, inserting the spacecraft into a halo orbit about the L1 sun-earth libration point, exposing the collectors to the solar wind for two years, and then returning the collectors to earth. The collectors will then be made available for analysis by various methods to determine the elemental and isotopic abundance of the solar wind. In preparation for this mission, potential collector materials are being characterized to determine baseline impurity levels and to assess detection limits for various analysis techniques. As part of the effort, potential solar wind collector materials have been analyzed using resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS). RIMS is a particularly sensitivity variation of secondary neutral mass spectrometry that employs resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) to selectively postionize an element of interest, and thus discriminates between low levels of that element and the bulk material. The high sensitivity and selectivity of RIMS allow detection of very low concentrations while consuming only small amounts of sample. Thus, RIMS is well suited for detection of many heavy elements in the solar wind, since metals heavier than Fe are expected to range in concentrations from 1 ppm to 0.2 ppt. In addition, RIMS will be able to determine concentration profiles as a function of depth for these implanted solar wind elements effectively separating them from terrestrial contaminants. RIMS analyses to determine Ti concentrations in Si and Ge samples have been measured. Results indicate that the detection limit for RIMS analysis of Ti is below 100 ppt for 106 averages. Background analyses of the mass spectra indicate that detection limits for heavier elements will be similar. Furthermore, detection limits near 1 ppt are possible with higher repetition rate lasers where it will be possible to increase signal averaging to 108 laser shots.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 551: Symposium JJ – Materials in Space-Science, Technology & Exploration , 1998 , 83
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A detailed discussion of the Genesis Discovery mission can be found on the Internet at www.gps.caltech.edu/genesis/.Google Scholar
2 Treiman, A. H., Curation of Solar Wind Collector Plates front a Solar Wind Sample Return (SWSR) Spacecraft Mission, NASA Report No. JSC 26406 (October, 1993).Google Scholar
3 Young, C. E., Pellin, M. J., Calaway, W. F., Jörgensen, B., Schweitzer, E. L., and Gruen, D. M., Nucl. Inst. Method. B27, 119–129 1987.Google Scholar
4 Pellin, M. J., Young, C. E., Calaway, W. F., Whitten, J. E., Gruen, D. G., Blum, J. D., Hutcheon, I. D., and Wasserburg, G. J., Phil Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 333, 133–146 1990.Google Scholar
5 Ma, Z., Thompson, R. N., Lykke, K. R., Pellin, M. J., and Davis, A. M., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3168–3176 1995.Google Scholar
6 Calaway, W. F., Coon, R. C., Pellin, M. J., Young, C. E., Whitten, J. E., Wiens, R. C., Gruen, D. M., Stingeder, G., Penka, V., Grasserbauer, M., and Burnett, D. S., RIS 92, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 128, pp. 271–274 (IOP Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
7 Hansen, C. S., Calaway, W. F., Pellin, M. J., Wiens, R. C., and Burnett, D. S., RIS 96, AIP Conference Proceeding No. 338, pp. 215–218 (AIP Press, 1997).Google Scholar
8 Calaway, W. F., Coon, R. C., Pellin, M. J., Gruen, D. M., Gordon, M., Diebold, A. C., Maillot, P., Banks, J. C., and Knapp, J. A., Surf Interface Anal. 21, 131–137 1994.Google Scholar
9 Betz, G. and Wien, K., Int. J. Mass. Spec. and Ion Proc. 140, 1–110 1994.Google Scholar
10 Calaway, W. F., Spiegel, D. R., Marshall, A. H., Downey, S. W., and Pellin, M. J., CARRI 96, AIP Conference Proceeding No. 392, pp. 739–742 (AIP Press, 1997).Google Scholar