Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:00:36.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Carbon Nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lyubov Lafi
Affiliation:
[email protected], UQTR, IRH, 3351 boul.des Forges, Trois-Rivieres, G9A 5H7, Canada, 819 376-5011 4460, 819 376-5164
Richard Chahine
Affiliation:
[email protected], UQTR, IRH, 3351 boul. des Forges, P.O. Box 500, Trois-Rivieres, G9A 5H7, Canada
Pierre Bénard
Affiliation:
[email protected], UQTR, IRH, 3351 boul. des Forges, P.O. Box 500, Trois-Rivieres, G9A 5H7, Canada
Éric Poirier
Affiliation:
[email protected], UQTR, IRH, 3351 boul. des Forges, P.O. Box 500, Trois-Rivieres, G9A 5H7, Canada
Get access

Abstract

We present results of a study of the effect of various surface treatments on the adsorption properties of hydrogen on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and activated carbon. The alteration of the surface area by thermal and chemical treatments of SWNTs was studied by Raman spectroscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and nitrogen adsorption. The Horwath-Kawazoe (HK) method was applied to describe the increase of the surface area and of the pore volume of the SWNT samples. The surface treatments lead to substantially improvement of hydrogen adsorption at 77 K and 1 atm. The averaged heat of adsorption (enthalpy), estimated from a Dubinin-Astakhov (DA) analysis, was found to be about 3.6 and 4.2 kJ/mol for heat-treated and as-received SWNTs, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lafi, L., Cossement, D., Chahine, R., Carbon 43, 13471357 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Cinke, M., Li, J., Chen, B., Cassell, A., Delzeit, L., Han, J. and Meyyappan, M., Chem. Phys. Lett. 365, 6974, (2002).Google Scholar
3. Poirier, E., Chahine, R., Bénard, P., Tessier, A., Bose, T.. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 055101.1055101.6, (2005).Google Scholar
4. Yu, Z., Brus, L., J. Phys. Chem. 104, 1099510999 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Ago, H., Kugler, T., Cacialli, F., Salaneck, W.R., Shaffer, M.S.P. et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 81168121 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Czerny, A., Bénard, P., Chahine, R., Langmuir 21, 2871-2875 (2005).Google Scholar