Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:52:38.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved Conformality of CVD Titanium Nitride Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Xinye Liu ,
Yuan Z. LU  and
Roy G. Gordon
Xinye Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry
Yuan Z. LU
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138
Roy G. Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry
Get access

Abstract

We demonstrate a novel approach to improving the step coverage of thin films made by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Titanium nitride (TiN) films were deposited by atmospheric pressure CVD using tetrakis(diethylamido)titanium vapor (TDEAT) and ammonia gas (NH3) carried in nitrogen gas. Trimethylamine (NMe3) gas was added during some of the depositions. The substrates were patterned silicon wafers having holes with aspect ratio of 3.5 through a silicon dioxide layer. We discovered that the step coverage was significantly increased for TiN films made with NMe3. At 320 °C, the step coverage was increased from 70% to nearly 100%. Within the range of deposition temperatures used in our study, 320 °C to 370 °C, the amount of improvement increased as the deposition temperature decreased. The trimethylamine did not increase the resistivity or the impurity levels in the films, but it did reduce the growth rate slightly. We suggest that the trimethylamine adsorbs onto the surface, temporarily blocking some of the sites on which growth could take place. Thus the effective sticking coefficients for the precursors are decreased, and the step coverage is increased.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 555: Symposium OO – Properties and Processing of Vapor-Deposited Coatings , 1998 , 135
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Onuki, Jin and Nihei, Masayasu, Materials Transactions 36, 670 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Mandl, M., Hoffman, H., and Kucher, P., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2127 (1990); J. N. Musher and R. G. Gordon, J. Electron. Mater. 20, 1105 (1991); F. Pintchovski and E. Travis, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 260, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) p. 777; I. J. Raaijmakers, R. N. Vrtis, J. Yang, S. Ramaswami, A. Lagendijk, D. A. Roberts, and E. K. Broadbent, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 260, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) p. 99; M. Eizenberg, MRS Bulletin, November, 1995, 38.Google Scholar
3. Bang, D. S., McVittie, J. P., Saraswat, K. C., lacoponi, J. A., Gray, J., Krivokapic, K. A. Littau, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 389, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) p. 173.Google Scholar
4. Raupp, G. B. and Cale, T. S., Chemistry of Materials 1, 207 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Musher, J. N. and Gordon, R. G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 736 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Raaijmakers, I. J. et al., ref. 2.Google Scholar