Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:02:34.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implant Isolation Mechanisms in GaAs, AlGaAs, InP and InGaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
C. R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
W. S. Hobson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
A. E. Von Neida
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the thermal stability of high resistivity regions introduced by ion bombardment of GaAs, AlGaAs, InP and InGaAs. For low doses in which the ion species density is below that of the doping density in the target material, we obtain the usual damage-related compensation in which deep levels created by the bombardment trap the charge carriers. By this method one creates material with resistivities around 108 Ω/□ (n- or p-type GaAs and AlGaAs, p-type InP), around 106 Ω/□ (n-type InP) or around 105 Ω/□ (n-type InGaAs or p-type InGaAs), with a return of the initial resistivity after elevated temperature annealing (∼600°C for GaAs and AIGaAs, ∼500°C for InP and InGaAs). The more interesting case is the use of higher dose implants of species which create chemical deep levels. This occurs for O in n-type AlGaAs where O creates a deep acceptor (Ec-0.49 eV), and Fe in n-type InP and InGaAs, where it is also a deep acceptor. When the concentration of these species exceeds the doping density in the material, the bombarded regions retain their high resistivity even after high temperature annealing (> 1000°C for GaAs and AIGaAs, >850°C for InP and InGaAs). The case of O in GaAs appears to represent a third mechanism; it creates thermally stable material only in the case of Be-doped GaAs, suggesting an ion-pairing reaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Donnelly, J. P., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 182/183, 553 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Morgan, D. V. and Eisen, F. H., Gallium Arsenide-Materials, Devices and Circuits, ed. Howes, M. J. and Morgan, D. V. (Wiley and Sons, NY 1985), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
3. Stephens, K. G., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 209/210, 589 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Woodhouse, J. D., Donnelly, J. P. and Tseler, G. W., Solid-State Electronics 31, 13 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Donnelly, J. P. and Hurwitz, C. E., Solid-State Electronics 20, 727 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Short, K. T. and Pearton, S. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 2835 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Pearton, S. J., Ianuzzi, M. P., Reynolds, C. L. and Peticolas, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 395 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Wallis, R. H., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 56, 73 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Macrander, A. T. and Schwartz, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 35, 293 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Abernathy, C. R., Pearton, S. J., Panish, M. B., Hamm, R. A. and Lunardi, L. M., Proc. GaAs and Rel. Compounds 1988 (in press).Google Scholar