Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:49:41.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Silicon Migration Through Buffer Material on the Lifetime of Vitrified Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Seiichiro Mitsui ,
Hitoshi Makino ,
Manabu Inagaki  and
Takanori Ebina
Seiichiro Mitsui
Affiliation:
Geological Isolation Research and Development Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1194, Japan
Hitoshi Makino
Affiliation:
Geological Isolation Research and Development Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1194, Japan
Manabu Inagaki
Affiliation:
Geological Isolation Research and Development Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1194, Japan
Takanori Ebina
Affiliation:
NESI Incorporated, 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1112, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of silicon migration through buffer material on the lifetime of vitrified waste. The results indicate that the lifetime depends on a combination of the dissolved glass fraction in the non-steady-state phase controlled by the silicon pore diffusion coefficient (Dp) and the silicon distribution coefficient (Kd) in the buffer material and the steady-state dissolution rate defined by Dp and the groundwater flow rate (Q) in the excavation disturbed zone. In the case where the glass dissolution rate reaches the steady-state dissolution rate, the sensitivity of the lifetime to Dp and Q varies according to the magnitude relationship between Dp and Q. We also discuss the impact on the lifetime of glass hydration, which proceeds simultaneously with glass matrix dissolution. The results show that glass hydration is less important for the lifetime than glass matrix dissolution in an open system and it can be concluded that silicon migration through the buffer material will be an important process for estimating the lifetime of the vitrified waste. A preliminary calculation of the long-term waste behavior with realistic assumptions indicates the importance of the silicon migration parameters Kd and Dp, which control the dissolution behavior of the vitrified waste in the non-steady-state phase, for evaluating radionuclide release.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1193: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIII , 2009 , 397
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grambow, B., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 15–27 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Curti, E. and Smith, P. A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 31–39 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Curti, E., Godon, N. and Vernaz, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 294, 163–170 (1993).Google Scholar
4 Pescatore, C., Radiochim. Acta 66/67, 389–394 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Maillard, S. and Iracane, D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 506, 231–238 (1998).Google Scholar
6 Aertsens, M. and Iseghem, P. Van, Proceedings of the European Nuclear Society Meeting, 339–343 (1999).Google Scholar
7 Iseghem, P. Van et al. , Final report of the GLAMOR European Project, Contract No FIKW-CT-2001-00140 (2007).Google Scholar
8 Inagaki, Y., Furuya, H., Idemitsu, K. and Yonezawa, S., Journal of Nuclear Materials 208, 27–34 (1994).Google Scholar
9 Mitsui, S. and Aoki, R., Journal of Nuclear Materials 298, 184–191 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Grambow, B. and Muller, R., Journal of Nuclear Materials 298, 112–124 (2001).Google Scholar
11 Canniere, P. De, Moors, H., Dierckx, A., Gasiaux, F., Aertsens, M., Put, M. and Iseghem, P. Van, Radiochim. Acta 82, 191–196 (1998).Google Scholar
12 Aertsens, M., Canniere, P. De and Moors, H., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 61, 117–129 (2003).Google Scholar
13 Ribet, I. et al. , Final report of the GLASTAB European Project, Contract No FIKW-CT-2000-00007 (2007).Google Scholar
14 Wakasugi, K., Makino, H. and Robinson, P., JNC Technical Report, TN8400 99-095 (1999).Google Scholar
15 Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, JNC Technical Report, TN1410 2000-001∼004 (2000).Google Scholar
16 Makino, H. and Yoshida, T., PNC Technical Report, TN8410 96-093 (in Japanese) (1996).Google Scholar
17 Wollast, R. and Garrels, R. M., Nature (Phys. Sci) 229, 94 (1971).Google Scholar
18 Applin, K. R., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 51, 2147–2151 (1987).Google Scholar
19 Rebreanu, L., Vanderborght, J.-P. and Chou, L., Marine Chemistry 112, 230–233 (2008).Google Scholar
20 Sato, H., Proceedings of the 28th Symp. on HLW, LLW, Mixed Wastes and Environmental Restoration, Feb. 24–28, 2002, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A., pp. 1–15 (2002).Google Scholar
21 Ashida, T., Kohara, Y., Shibutani, T. and Yui, M., PNC Technical Report, TN8410 98-014 (1998).Google Scholar
22 Fujiwara, K. (private communication).Google Scholar