Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:23:22.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of Porosity Heterogeneity in the Diffusion of Some Alkali- and Alkaline Earth-Metals in Crystalline Rock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. Johansson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
J. Byegård
Affiliation:
Dep. of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, [email protected]
M. Skålberg
Affiliation:
Dep. of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Data from diffusion experiments using Na+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and Ba2+ as tracers in a crystalline rock type (Äspö diorite, originating from the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory) have been evaluated using a heterogeneity model. The model concept consists of diffusion in a variety of different channels with different porosities. The porosity distribution used has been obtained from independently performed measurements of porosity distributions using the 14C-polymethylmethacrylate impregnation method. Breakthrough curves in through-diffusion experiments as well as penetration profiles in the matrix have been evaluated using the porosity distributions. In the calculations only two parameters, the pore diffusivity (Dp) and the sorption distribution coefficient (Kd) have been varied in order to fit the experimental data to the proposed model. For the penetration profile of more strongly sorbing tracers, i.e., Cs+ and Ba2+, a significantly better explanation of the data is obtained using a heterogeneity model compared to using a uniform porosity distribution model. The data from the through-diffusion experiments gives a better explanation of the shape at the beginning of the breakthrough curve. The implication of the proposed diffusion model is discussed, both from an in situ sorption experiment application and a performance assessment application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Neretnieks, I., J. Geophys. Res. 85, 4379 (1980)Google Scholar
2 Moreno, L., Gylling, B., Neretnieks, I., J. Contam. Hydrol. 25, 283 (1998)Google Scholar
3 Haggerty, R., Fleming, S.W., Meigs, L. C., McKenna, S. A., in review, submitted December 1998 to Water Resources Research Google Scholar
4 Hellmuth, K. H., Lukkarinen, S., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Isotopenpraxis Enviro. Health Stud. 30, 47 (1994)Google Scholar
5 Johansson, H., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Skålberg, M., Tullborg, E. L., J. Cont Hydrol. 35, 41(1998)Google Scholar
6 Bradbury, M. H. and Green, A., J. Hydrol. 82, 39 (1985)Google Scholar
7 Johansson, H., Byegård, J., Skamemark, G., Skålberg, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 465 Pittsburg PA 1997 p. 871878 Google Scholar
8 Crank, J., The mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York 1975, p 5051 Google Scholar
9 Haggerty, R. and Gorelick, S. M., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 62 (1998)Google Scholar
10 Byegård, J., Johansson, H., Skålberg, M., Tullborg, E. L., SKB TR-98-18, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Box 5864, SE-102 40 Stockholm, 1998 Google Scholar
11 Winberg, A. (ed) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory International Cooperation Report 96-04, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Box 5864, SE-102 40 Stockholm, 1999 Google Scholar