Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:13:58.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imaging of Diffusion Processes in Differently Crosslinked Polystyrenes by 1H and 19F-Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Ilg. B. Pfleiderer ,
K. Albert ,
W. Rapp  and
E. Bayer
M. Ilg. B. Pfleiderer
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital, NMR Center, Charlestown, MA, USA
K. Albert
Affiliation:
University of Tuebingen, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Tuebingen, Germany.
W. Rapp
Affiliation:
University of Tuebingen, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Tuebingen, Germany.
E. Bayer
Affiliation:
University of Tuebingen, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Tuebingen, Germany.
Get access

Extract

Polymeric beads are valuable tools for a variety of applications in chemistry, e.g. separation and synthesis support. A common property of all applications is, that diffusion processes and mass transport balances play an important part and are heavily dependent upon matrix parameters such as crosslinking. We have applied 1H and 19F-microscopy to monitor diffusion processes in differently crosslinked polystyrene beads (CL-PS). MRI is used primarily as a medical diagnostic method, but has begun to find increasing application in material science, including studies of fluids in polymers [1,2].

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 217: Symposium U – Advanced Tomographic Imaging Methods for the Analysis of Materials , 1990 , 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rothwell, W.P. and Gentempo, P.P., Bruker Report 1, 46 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Weisenburger, L.A. and Koenig, J., Polym.Prepr. 29, 98 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Haase, A., Frahm, J., Matthaei, D., Merboldt, K.D. and Haenicke, W., J.Magn.Reson. 67, 217 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Blackband, C. and Mansfield, P., J.Phys C–L49 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Ilg, M., Albert, K., Rapp, W. and Bayer, E., J.Magn.Reson. in press.Google Scholar
6. Ilg, M., Maier-Rosenkranz, J., Mueller, W. and Bayer, E., J.Chromatogr. 517, 263 (1990).Google Scholar