Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:22.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogen Passivation of Si(100) by Remote Hydrogen Plasma Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

T. Hsu
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
B. Anthony
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
L. Breaux
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
R. Qian
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
S. Banerjee
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
A. Tasch
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
S. Lin
Affiliation:
Center of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
H. L. Marcus
Affiliation:
Center of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen passivation of the Si(100) surface prepared by a two-stage remote hydrogen plasma treatment has been investigated using Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) and Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED). AES analysis was employed to examine the degree of passivation at different temperatures by monitoring the level of impurities, mainly oxygen and carbon, readsorbed on the Si surface after exposure to air for two hours. RHEED analysis was used to investigate the reconstructed surface structure and the results were correlated with the results of AES analysis. It was found that better Si surface passivation is achieved at a lower substrate temperature during the remote hydrogen plasma treatment. Silicon epitaxial growth by Remote Plasma-enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (RPCVD) was attempted on the H-passivated Si(100) at 305°C. It was found that epitaxial growth is achievable on these wafers even after 2 hours air exposure without further cleaning prior to growth. We have also observed for the first time electron-beam-induced oxygen adsorption on the Si surface prepared by remote hydrogen plasma clean and have confirmed this by Scanning Auger Microscopy (SAM) at various electron beam current densities. The adsorption of oxygen and carbon on the H-terminated Si surface from the ambient upon 3 keV electron beam irradiation is believed to be associated with either the breakage of the Si-H bond or rearrangement of bonding between Si, H, and O, resulting in a loss of hydrogen passivation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Anthony, B., Breaux, L., Hsu, T., Banerjee, S., and Tasch, A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B7, 621, 1989.Google Scholar
[2] Masaaki, Niwa, Hiroshi, Iwasaki, and Shigehika, Hasegawa, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A8, 266, 1990.Google Scholar
[3] Maruno, S., Iwasaki, H., Horioka, K., Li, S. T., and Nakamura, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21, L263, 1982.Google Scholar
[4] Fenner, D. B., Biegelsen, D. K., and Bringans, R. D., J. Appl. Phys. 66(1), 419, 1989.Google Scholar
[5] Zazzera, L.A. and Moulder, J. F., J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol.136, No. 2, 484, 1989.Google Scholar
[6] Hiroyuki, Hirayama and Toru, Tatsumi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54(16), 1561, 1989.Google Scholar
[7] Higashi, G. S., Chabal, Y. J., Trucks, G. W., and Raghavachari, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56(7), 656, 1990.Google Scholar
[8] Anthony, B., Hsu, T., Qian, R., Banerjee, S., and Tasch, A., to be published in J. of Electronics Materials.Google Scholar
[9] Hsu, T., Anthony, B., Qian, R., Magee, C., Harrington, W., Banerjee, S., and Tasch, A., to be published in the Proceeding of SPIE Conference, March 1990.Google Scholar
[10] Knotek, M. L. and Houston, J. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 20(3), 544, 1982.Google Scholar
[11] Chao, S. S., Tyler, J. E., Takagi, Y., Pai, P. G., Lucovsky, G., Lin, S. Y., Wong, C. K., and Mantini, M. J., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A4, 1574, 1986.Google Scholar
[12] Hsu, T., Anthony, B., Qian, R., Magee, C., Harrington, W., Banerjee, S., and Tasch, A., to be published in J. of Electronics Materials.Google Scholar
[13] Schulze, G. and Henzler, M., Surface Science 124, 337, 1983.Google Scholar
[14] Gates, S. M., Suface Science, 195, 307, 1988.Google Scholar
[15] Chabal, Y. J., Raghavachari, K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 54, 1055, 1985.Google Scholar
[16] Schaefer, J., Stucki, F., Frankel, D., Gopel, W., and Lapeyre, G., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B2, 359,1984.Google Scholar
[17] Matsunami, N., Hasebe, Y. and Itoch, N., Surface Science, 192, 27, 1987.Google Scholar
[18] Knotek, M. L. and Houston, L. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 20, 544, 1982.Google Scholar