Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:13:33.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydration Effect Analysis of Ion-sensitive Field Effect Transistor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lihong Jiao
Affiliation:
[email protected], Grand Valley State University, School Of Engineering, Grand Rapids, United States
Mykhaylo Rybachek
Affiliation:
[email protected], Grand Valley State University, School Of Engineering, Grand Rapids, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this work, the drift of ISFET characteristics due to hydration effect was studied. The ISFETs were fabricated using the standard NMOS process. The AgCl reference electrode was fabricated with the electrolysis method. The ISFET modeling was carried out in MATLAB to study the time variation of surface potential and the drain-source current. In addition, the surface morphology and dielectric constant of silicon dioxide were tested to study the hydration effect in order to eliminate the drift. The dielectric constant of the gate oxide increases exponentially with hydration time. The surface morphology studied with the atomic force microscope (AFM) showed no significant change after immersion in water. It is believed that the main cause of the drift is the hydration effect, which is due to the change in dielectric constant of the sensing material and a small number of surface binding sites that react slowly to a change in pH.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Liao, Wei-Yin, Lin, Hung-Yin and Chou, Tse-Chuan, 0-7803-9105-5/05/©2005 IEEEGoogle Scholar
2ISFET-based measuring device and method for correcting drift. United States Patent 4701253Google Scholar
3 Lambrechts, Marc, Sansen, Willy M. C. “Biosensors: microelectrochemical devices”, Page 69 Google Scholar
4 Siu, William M., Cobbold, Richard S.C., IEEE Transactions On Electron Devices, Vol. Ed-26, No. 11, November 1979 Google Scholar
5 Chan, P. K. and Chen, D. Y., IEEE Transactions On Circuits And Systems, Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2007 Google Scholar
6 Grattarola, Massimo, Massobrio, Giuseppe, and Sergio, , IEEE Transactions On Electron Devices. Vol. 39. No. 4. April 1992 Google Scholar
7 Jamasb, Shahriar, Collins, Scott D., and Smith, Rosemary L., IEEE Transactions On Electron Devices, Vol. 45, No. 6, June 1998 Google Scholar
8 Rybachek, Mykhaylo, Jiao, Lihong Heidi, ASEE Annual Conference, in submissionGoogle Scholar
9 Gray, Paul R., Hurst, Paul J., Lewis, Stephen H., Meyer, Robert G. (2009). Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, New York: Wiley. p. 40.Google Scholar