Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:55.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High Temperature, High Pressure Absorption Spectra of Uranyl Chloride Solutions Under Shock Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Arnold H. Ewald
Arnold H. Ewald*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Mineralogy, PO Box 136, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
Get access

Extract

In 1960 David and Ewald [1] developed a technique for photographing the absorption spectra of solutions under shock wave conditions. A photograph of the spectrum of a uranyl nitrate solution exposed to a shock wave of 75 kbar showed the absorption to extend beyond 500 nm, the long wavelength limit for uranyl solutions under ordinary conditions. A.H. Ewald (unpublished, 1963) found that at room temperature pressure up to 6 kbar had no appreciable effect on absorption. Bell and Biggers [2,3] published an analysis of the spectrum of uranyl perchlorate solutions. The longest wavelength absorption band was at 486 nm but Bell [4] later found bands at 508 and 531 nm. The intensity of these very weak bands increased when the solution was heated to 95° C, and they were interpreted as “hot bands” due to absorption from an excited ground state. This paper reports new absorption measurements made on uranyl solutions heated to 250°C at low pressure and offers an interpretation of the effect observed in the shock experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 22: Symposium NY – High Pressure in Science and Technology , 1983 , 161
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. David, H.G., and Ewald, A.H., Aust. J. Appl. Sci. 11, 317 (1960).Google Scholar
2. Bell, J.T., and Biggers, R.E., J. Mol. Spectros. 18, 247 (1965).Google Scholar
3. Bell, J.T., and Biggers, R.E., J. Mol. Spectros. 25, 312 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Bell, J.T., J. Mol. Spectros. 41, 409 (1972).Google Scholar
5. Hamann, S.D., in Advances in High Pressure Research, Vol. I, Bradley, R.S., ed. (Academic Press, London and New York 1966) p. 85.Google Scholar
6. David, H.G., and Hamann, S.D., Trans. Farad. Soc. 55, 72 (1959).Google Scholar
7. Rice, M.H., and Walsh, J.M., J. Chem. Phys. 26, 824 (1957).Google Scholar
8. Hamann, S.D., and Linton, M., Trans. Farad. Soc. 65, 2186 (1969).Google Scholar
9. Hamann, S.D., in Chemistry and Geochemistry of Solutions at High Temperatures and High Pressures, Rickard, D. and Wickman, F.E., eds. (Pergamon Press, London 1981) p.89.Google Scholar
10. Hamann, S.D., in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, No.9, Conway, B.E. and Bockris, J. O'M., eds. (Plenum Press, New York 1974) p. 47.Google Scholar
11. Baes, C.F., and Mesmer, R.E., The Hydrolysis of Cations (John Wiley, New York 1976) p. 174.Google Scholar
12. Stranks, D.R., Pure Appl. Chem. 38, 303 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ewald, A.H., and Scudder, J.D., J. Phys. Chem. 76, 249 (1972).Google Scholar
14. Asano, M., and Koningstein, J.A., Can. J. Chem. 60, 2207 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar