Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:35:46.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heteroepitaxy of Ge on Vicinal Si(100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Mohan Krishnamurthy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
Jeff S. Drucker
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
J.A. Venables
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 School of MaPS, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, England
Get access

Abstract

The initial stages of germanium heteroepitaxy on vicinal Si(100) have been studied using in-situ deposition in a UHV STEM. Germanium was deposited using molecular beam techniques onto substrates misoriented 1° and 5* toward <110> held at room temperature, 375°C and 525°C. Film thicknesses were in the range 4-6 ML, just greater than the stable intermediate layer of 3-4ML (1ML = 0.14nm). The Ge clusters were observed using biassed secondary electron (b-SE) imaging with nanometer resolution. Comparisons were made between deposition at the elevated temperatures, and room temperature deposition followed by anneals at the same temperatures.

Annealing the low temperature deposits produces coarsening of the islands which is similar on the 1° and 5° samples. Island size distributions and other film growth parameters obtained from the 375°C and 525°C anneals indicate that the coarsening is different at these temperatures and is possibly affected by instabilities in the intermediate layer. Results of the high temperature depositions indicate that neither surface steps nor the edges of islands act as perfect sinks, and that diffusion distances are of the order of several microns. The nucleation density and size distributions are markedly different for deposition at 375°C and 525°C possibly due to competitive capture at strong sinks.

In a parallel set of experiments in a standard UHV chamber, macroscopic wafer samples were analyzed with RHEED, Auger and secondary electron spectroscopy. These correlate well with the intermediate layer thicknesses previously reported in the literature, and the large contrast observed in the b-SE images. Ex situ TEM studies of samples grown in this chamber show islands with various contrast features including those of coherent strain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bean, J. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 1427(1986).Google Scholar
[2] Pearsall, Thomas P., CRC Critical Reviews in Solid state and Materials Sciences 15, 551(1989) and references quoted.Google Scholar
[3] Eaglesham, D. J. and Cerullo, M., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 35, 328 (1990)Google Scholar
[4] Venables, J. A., Phys. Rev. B 36, 4153 (1987).Google Scholar
[5] Venables, J.A., Doust, T. and Kariotis, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 94, 3 (1987); T. Doust, F. L. Metcalfe and J. A. Venables, Ultramicroscopy 31,116 (1989)Google Scholar
[6] Zinke-Allmang, M., Feldman, L. C., Nakahara, S. and Davidson, R. A., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7848(1989)Google Scholar
[7] Drucker, J.S., Krishnamurthy, M., Hong, Luo Chuan, Hembree, G.G. and Venables, J.A., Proc. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 98 (EMAG '89), 303 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Virginia Semiconductor Inc.Google Scholar
[9] Swartzenruber, B. S., Mo, Y.-W., Webb, M. B. and Lagally, M. G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 2901 (1989).Google Scholar
[10] Semper 6 plus Synoptics.Google Scholar
[11] Gossman, H. J. and Fisanick, G. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol A 6, 2037 (1988).Google Scholar
[12] Lagally, M. G. and Mo, Y. W., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 35, 310 (1990).Google Scholar