Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:05:48.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hall Effect and Magnetoresistance in Undoped Poly(3 Hexylthiophene)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Azar Assadi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Christer Svensson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus Willander
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

We report studies of transport properties of thin films of undoped poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) fabricated by spinning a polymer solution onto oxidised silicon or glass. The film thicknesseswere on the order of 1000 Å. We studied magnetoresistance, the effect of magnetic field on field effect mobility and Hall effect.

Transverse magnetoresistance was measured on films on glass. A positive anomalous magnetoresistance with a saturation value of about 0.1 % was found. Transverse magnetoresistance was also studied by measuring the change of a field effect mobility with magnetic field. This measurement was performed using the field effect transistor structure. An initial mobility of 6.5 × 10−5 cm2/Vs was reduced by about 15 % in a transverse magnetic field.

We also carried out Hall effect measurements on films on glass using a Van der Pauw contact configuration. The measured Hall mobility was 2.17 × 10−5 cm2/Vs. Finally we measured the temperature dependence of the Hall mobility and found it follow the exp(T-l/4) law of variable range hopping.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Colson, R. and Nagals, P., Philosophical Magazine B, Vol.38 No.5 , (1978 ).Google Scholar
2. Harbeke, G., Baeriswyl, D., Kiess, K. and Kobel, , Phys. Scr. (1986).Google Scholar
3. Lögdlund, M., Lazzaroni, R., Stafström, S., Salanek, W. R. and Bredas, J.-L., Phys. Rev. Letters, 17 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Assadi, A., Svensson, C., Willander, M. and Inganas, O., Appl. Phys. Lett., 53 195197 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Paloheimo, J., Punkka, E., Stubb, H. and Kuivalainen, P., in Metzger, R. M., ed., Proc. of NATO Advanced Study Institute on Lower Dimensional Systems and Molecular Devices, Spetses, Greece, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Inganäs, O., Salanack, W. R., Österholm, J. E. and Lookso, J., J. Synth. Met., 22. 395 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Mehra, M., Shyam, R. and Mathur, P. C., Thin Solid Films, 100 81109 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Isotalo, H., Kuivalainen, P., Stubb, H., Österholm, J. E., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 171–180 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Movaghar, B. and Schweitzer, L., J. Phys. C, 11 125 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kurobe, A. and Kamimura, H., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 59&60 4144 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Datta, T., Applied Phys. Comm., 3 131 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Movaghar, B., Pohlmann, B. and Würtz, G., J. Phys. C, 14 51275137 (1981).Google Scholar