Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:36.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Morphologies, Fragmentation Patterns, and Hardness in Sodium Hydrogen Urate Monohydrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2015

A. B. Brune
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, PO Box 871604, Tempe, AZ, USA
W.T. Petuskey
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, PO Box 871604, Tempe, AZ, USA
Get access

Abstract

Mechanical properties and new morphological data on synthetic sodium hydrogen urate monohydrate are reported and interpreted. Crystals formed in supersaturated aqueous solutions were identified by powder x-ray diffraction. Intact grains and separate needles were examined by several microscopy techniques, some reported here for the first time. The dominant morphology was spherulite-type, comprising tapered, branched blades (needles) radiating out of a common core. The pointed blade tips were truncated by (011) planes, corresponding to hydrogen-bonded planes. Branching was at about a 5° angle or its multiples, suggesting it accommodated by dislocation arrays at the low angle boundaries, as is often seen in twinning. Vicker’s micro-hardness, extrapolated to zero porosity, was 0.90 GPa, which is greater than the hardness measured by nano-indentation. Present results are anticipated to be useful in interpreting the mechanical characteristics of the material crystallized in vivo and its action concerning gout, and affording inferences on the role of the milieu on morphologies, fragmentation, and hardness.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mandel, N.S., and Mandel, G.S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 2319 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H., Reginato, A.J., and Schumacher, H.R., Ann. Rheumatic Diseases, 42, 75(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, L., Metabolism, 6, 230 (1957).Google Scholar
Fiechtner, J.J., and Simkin, P.A., J. American Medical Association, 245, 1533 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fam, A.G., Schumacher, H.R. Jr., Clayburne, G., Sieck, M., Mandel, N.S., Cheng, P-T., and Pritzker, K.P.H., The Journal of Rheumathology, 19, 780 (1992).Google Scholar
Perrin, C.M., and Swift, J.A., CrystEngComm 14, 1709 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perl-Treves, D., and Addadi, L., Proc. Royal Society of London B, 235, 145(1988).Google Scholar
Rinaudo, C., and Boistelle, R., Journal of Crystal Growth, 57, 432 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irusan, T., Arivuoli, D., and Ramasamy, P., J. Mat. Sci. Letters, 12, 405 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar