Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:44:20.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Competition During Double Recalescence in Fe-Cr-Ni Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. M. Matson*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The rapid solidification of a Fe- 12wt%Cr- 16wt%Ni alloy was investigated under containerless processing conditions using both ground-based electromagnetic levitation equipment and aboard the shuttle Columbia using the TEMPUS facility. A high-speed digital video technique was used to image growth of the metastable ferritic phase and the stable austenitic phase into the undercooled melt. Above a critical undercooling, the metastable phase nucleates first. After a delay, a second thermal rise is observed during transformation to the stable phase. Double recalescence events were observed at temperatures consistent with the To, temperature of the bcc phase thus defining a value of the critical undercooling for metastable nucleation which is significantly lower than previously predicted. For a given liquid temperature the velocity of the stable fcc phase is greater than that of the metastable bcc phase. The velocity for growth of the stable phase into the semi-solid which forms during primary metastable recalescence was also measured and found to be independent of the initial undercooling. A model based on competitive growth of the two phases successfully predicts the limit where double recalescence events may be detected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Koseki, T. and Flemings, M.C., Met. Trans. 27A, pp. 32263240, (1996).Google Scholar
2 Koseki, T. and Flemings, M.C., Met. Trans. 26A, pp. 29912999, (1995).Google Scholar
3 Löser, W., Volkmann, T., and Herlach, D.M., Mater. Sci. Eng.. A178, pp. 163166, (1994).Google Scholar
4 Moir, S. and Herlach, D.M., Acta Metall. 45(7), pp. 28272837, (1997).Google Scholar
5 Volkmann, T., Löser, W., and Herlach, D.M., Int. J. Thermo. 17(5), pp. 12171226, (1996).Google Scholar
6 Volkmann, T., Löser, W., and Herlach, D.M., Met. Trans. 28A, pp. 453460, (1997).Google Scholar
7 Volkmann, T., Löser, W., and Herlach, D.M., Met. Trans. 28A, pp. 461469, (1997).Google Scholar
8 Gránásy, L., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 162, pp. 301303, (1993).Google Scholar
9 Matson, D.M., Shokuhfar, A., Lum, J.W., and Flemings, M.C., in Solidification Science and Processing, edited by Ohnaka, I. and Stefanescu, D.M., (TMS Warrendale, PA 1996), pp. 1926.Google Scholar
10 Matson, D.M., in Solidification 1998, edited by Marsh, S.P. et al. , (TMS Warrendale, PA 1998), pp. 233244.Google Scholar
11 Bui, Q.C., MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.Google Scholar
12 Matson, D.M., Loser, W., and Flemings, M.C., in Solidification 1999, edited by Marsh, S.P. et al. , (TMS Warrendale, PA 1999).Google Scholar