Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:33:30.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Granite Recrystallization - The Key to an Alternative Strategy for HLW Disposal?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Fergus G. F. Gibb
Fergus G. F. Gibb*
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3 JD, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

An alternative strategy is proposed for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other forms of high-level waste (HLW) whereby the integrity of a mined and engineered repository for the bulk of the waste need be preserved for only a few thousand years. This is achieved by separating the particularly problematic components, notably heat generating radionuclides (HGRs) and very long lived radionuclides (VLLRs) from the waste prior to disposal. Such a solution requires a satisfactory means of disposing of the relatively minor amounts of HGRs and VLLRs removed from the waste. This could be by high-temperature very deep disposal (HTVDD) in boreholes in the continental crust [1,2]. However, the viability of HTVDD, and hence the key to the entire strategy, depends on whether sufficient melting of granite host rock can occur at suitable temperatures and whether the melt can be completely recrystallized. The high-temperature, high-pressure experiments reported here demonstrate that granite can be partially melted and completely recrystallized on a time scale of years, as opposed to millennia as widely believed. Furthermore, both can be achieved at temperatures and on a time scale appropriate to the disposal of packages of heat generating HLW. It is therefore concluded that the proposed strategy, which offers, environmental, safety and economic benefits, could be a viable option for a substantial proportion of HLWs.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 937
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gibb, F.G.F., Waste Management, 19, 207–211 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Gibb, F.G.F., J. Geol. Soc. London, 157, 27–36 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Miller, W., Alexander, R., Chapman, N. and Smellie, J., Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes and Natural Analogues. (Pergamon, Amsterdam, 2000)Google Scholar
4. Chapman, N. and Gibb, F., Radwaste Solutions, May 2003 Issue. (2003)Google Scholar
5. Juhlin, C. and Sandstedt, H., SKB Technical Report, 89–39, (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, 1989)Google Scholar
6. Watts, T.H., Proceedings of the Third European Engineering Geology Conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, 467–490 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Logan, S.E., Nuclear Technology, 21, 111–124. (1974).Google Scholar
8. Attrill, P.G. and Gibb, F.G.F., Lithos, 67, 103–117. (2003).Google Scholar
9. Attrill, P.G. and Gibb, F.G.F., Lithos, 67, 119–133. (2003).Google Scholar
10. Gibb, F.G.F., Mineral. Mag., 39, 641–653. (1974).Google Scholar
11. Naney, M.T. and Swanson, S.E., Amer. Mineral, 65, 639–653. (1980).Google Scholar
12. Scaillet, B., Pichavant, M. and Roux, J., J. Petrol, 36, 663–705. (1995).Google Scholar