Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:40:53.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good Practice for the Assessment and Safe Handling of Nanomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Steve M. Hankin
Steve M. Hankin*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institute of Occupational Medicine, Safenano, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Nanotechnology has the potential to greatly improve our lives through medical, environmental and consumer products. Properties at the nanoscale are being exploited in new products, but they could also influence how the particles interact with humans and the environment. There is increasing consensus that for nanotechnology to reach its maximum potential, we must work to understand the hazards and exposure routes in order to minimise the risks. Good practice, founded on the principles of risk assessment and industrial hygiene, are applicable to a wide range of nanomaterials and nanostructured materials including nanoparticles, nanofibres, nanopowders, nanotubes, as well as aggregates and agglomerates of these materials. There is still considerable uncertainty about many aspects of effective risk assessment of nanomaterials, including the hazardous potential of many types of nanoparticles and the levels below which individuals might be exposed, with minimal likelihood of adverse health effects. It is prudent therefore to understand how to develop an appropriate strategy for the risk assessment, handling and disposing of nanomaterials, in the light of known and unknown hazards and exposures. This paper presents a perspective of the key components of risk assessment applicable to nanotechnology and novel materials.

Keywords

nanoscaleparticulatecommerce
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1209: Symposia P/YY – Business and Safety Issues in the Commercialization of Nanotechnology , 2009 , 1209-YY06-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTM 2007. “Standard Guide for Handling Unbound Engineered Nanoscale Particles in Occupational Settings”. ASTM E2535-07.Google Scholar
BSI 2007. PD 6699-2:2007: “Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials”.Google Scholar
COSHH (2002), as amended 2005, “The control of substances hazardous to health regulations”. SI 2002, No. 2677. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Defra 2006. Voluntary Reporting Scheme for Engineered Nanoscale Materials. Defra. Information available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/nanotech/policy.htm (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
DuPont / Environmental Defense Fund. NanoRisk Framework. Information available at: www.nanoriskframework.org (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
EC 2008. “Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research”. Available at ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/nanocode-recommendation.pdf (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
EC 1907/2006. Regulation No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).Google Scholar
EPA 2008. Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program. Information available at: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/stewardship.htm (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
HSE 2002. CHIP - Chemical (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2002. http://www.hse.gov.uk/chip/index.htmGoogle Scholar
ISO 14040:2006. “Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework”.Google Scholar
NIOSH 2009. “Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology – Managing the Health and Safety Concerns Associated with Engineered Nanomaterials”. NIOSH Publication No. 2009–125., Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-125/pdfs/2009-125.pdf (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. http://www.oecd.org/document/40/0,3343,en 2649 34377 37051368 1 1 1 1,00.html (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
OECD 2009. OECD Series on the Safety of Nanomaterials, Report 15: Preliminary review of OECD test guidelines for their applicability to manufactured nanomaterials. Available at: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2009doc.nsf/linkto/env-jm-mono(2009)21 (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar
Schulte, P.A., Geraci, C.L., Schubauer-Berigan, M.K., Zumwalde, R., Candis, M., McKernan, J.L. 2009, “Issues in the Development of Epidemiologic Studies of Workers Exposed to Engineered Nanoparticles”, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
WWICS 2007. “Nanotechnology and Life Cycle Assessment”. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/file download/files/NanoLCA 3.07.pdf (accessed 18 Nov 2009).Google Scholar