Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:24:13.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generation- Recombination Noise in Amorphous Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Charlie Main
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Steve Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Rashad I. Badran
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Hashemite University, Zaqar Jordan
Get access

Abstract

We examine different approaches to the analysis of noise in amorphous hydrogenated silicon associated with trapping and generation – recombination processes, which appear to predict very different noise spectra. In one approach the broad noise spectrum observed is assumed to be composed of a distribution of Lorentzian noise spectra, each associated with traps at a given energy depth, with appropriate weighting according to the energy distribution of characteristic time constants. This latter weighting is taken to mirror the energy distribution of states in the gap. This represents a linear superposition of the (weighted) contribution from individual trapping levels, each with its own characteristic time constant. This approach thus assumes that each trap level is an independent source of fluctuation in free carrier number, unaffected by the presence of other traps in the material. At first sight this assertion seems plausible, since in the multi-trapping situation envisaged, cross-correlation effects must be very small. However, the presence of several groups of traps, or, in the limit, a continuum, results in a distribution of characteristic time constants, which is not a simple linear superposition of the time constants for each level. Thus the assertion that a flat density of states, or a region which is flat, such as the top of a broadened level, results in a region of 1/f slope in the noise spectrum, may not be valid. We present an alternative model in which the distribution of time constants is appropriately incorporated, and compare the predictions of this model with the ‘superposition’ approach, using computed noise spectra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bathaei, F. Z. and Anderson, J. C., Philos. Mag.. B55, 87, (1988).Google Scholar
2. Johanson, R. E., Scansen, D. and Kasap, S.O., Philos. Mag.. B73, 707, (1996).Google Scholar
3. Verleg, P., “Noise spectroscopy of hydrogenated amorphous silicon”, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht (1997).Google Scholar
4. Parman, C.E. and Kakalios, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2529, 1991 Google Scholar
5. Fan, J., Lust, L.M. and Kakalios, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164/166, 469, 1993 Google Scholar
6. Zeil, A. van der, Fluctuation Phenomena in Semiconductors, Butterworths, London (1959)Google Scholar
7. Vliet, K.M. van and Fassett, J.R., in Fluctuation Phenomena in Solids, ed Burgess Academic Press New York (1967)Google Scholar
8. Main, C. and Owen, A. E., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a). 1, 297, (1970).Google Scholar
9. Marshall, J. M. and Main, C., Philos. Mag. B47, 471, (1983).Google Scholar
10. Lee, K., Amberiadis, K., and Ziel, A. van der, Solid State Elec. 25, 999, (1982).Google Scholar
11. Main, C., Reynolds, S. and Rose, M.J., in Future Directions in Thin Film Science and Technology ed. Marshall, J.M., Kirov, N., Vavrek, A. and Maud, J.M. (World Scientific, Singapore 1997) pp 7179.Google Scholar