Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:12:35.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A General Nonlithographic Method for Producing Nanodots by RIE Etching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jacob H. Leach
Affiliation:
[email protected], Virginia Commonwealth University, Electrical Engineering, 601 West Main St., Richmond, VA, 23284, United States
Hadis Morkoç
Affiliation:
[email protected], Virginia Commonwealth University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 601 West Main St., Richmond, VA, 23284, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this work, thin layers of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) on Ni on silicon <111> substrates were etched almost completely away by oxygen RIE, leaving only the topmost portion of the roughness, generating nanodots of PMMA approximately 30-40nm or smaller in size. After sufficiently hard baking the samples to promote PMMA adhesion to the Ni and to increase the robustness of the PMMA, the nanodots were used as a mask to etch the thin Ni films, thus generating Ni nanodots on Si. The Ni nanodots were then used as a reactive ion (RIE) etch mask, thereby generating Si nanopillars. With further understanding of the mechanism of the generation of the roughness of the PMMA, or with the use of other polymeric materials suitable as wet etching masks, nanodots of varying size should be attainable. This method represents a very simple, low cost, scalable, and general technique to produce nanodots of various thin metals on various substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gates, B.D, Xu, Q., Stewart, M., Ryan, D., Wilson, C.G, and Whitesides, G.M, “New approaches to nanofabrication: molding, printing, and other techniques”, Chem. Rev. 105, 1171 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Hsu, C.-H., Lo, H.-C., Chen, C.-F., Wu, C. T, Hwang, J.-S., Das, D., Tsai, J., Chen, L.-C., and Chen, K.-H., “Generally applicable self-masked dry etching technique for nanotip array fabrication”, Nano Letters, 4, 471 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Schulz, H., Scheer, H.-C., Hoffmann, T., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor, Pfeiffer, K., Bleidiessel, G., Grützner, G., Cardinaud, Ch., Gaboriau, F., Peignon, M.-C., Ahopelto, J., and Heidari, B., “New polymer materials for nanoimprinting”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18, 1861 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Bodas, D. S, Dabhade, R. V, Patil, S. J, and Gangal, S. A, “Comparative study of spin coated and sputtered PMMA as an etch mask for silicon micromachining”, Proc IEEE MHS 2001, 51, 2001.Google Scholar
5. Park, S., Schift, H., Solak, H. H, and Golbrecht, J., “Stamps for nanoimprint lithography by extreme ultraviolet interference lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22, 3246 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Kim, E., Xia, Y., Zhao, X.-M., and Whitesides, G.M, “Solvent-Assisted Microcontact Molding: A convenient method for fabricating three-dimensional structures on surfaces of polymers”, Adv. Mater. 9, 651 (1997).Google Scholar