Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:03:57.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GaN-Based MSM uv Photodetectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Liang
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909
W. Cai
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909
Y. Li
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909
Y. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909
Y. Lu
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909
C.A. Tran
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873
R.F. Karlicek
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873
I. Ferguson
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873
Get access

Abstract

Results obtained from interdigital metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) type of GaN based UV photodetectors are presented. MSM devices were fabricated using two types of GaN; high-resistive GaN and Mg doped GaN. For the high-resistive GaN detector, the lowest dark current is ∼0.1 nA and the UV responsivity of the device was about 460 AAV at a DC bias of 30 V. The Mg doped GaN exhibited large gains, 1150 A/W at 2.0 V, but at much higher dark currents, 400 nA. The high gain in this device is not well understood but was attributed to an ‘avalanche’ effect and is under investigation. It was found that the surface plasma treatment plays an important role in the device performance. After an appropriate plasma treatment the detectors showed higher responsivity with lower dark current.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Misra, M., Moustakas, T.D., Vaudo, R.P., Singh, Rajminder and Shah, K.S., SPIE, 2519, p. 78 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Larry, F. Reitz, SPIE, 1952, p. 14 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Walker, D., Zhang, X., Kung, P., Saxler, A., Javadpour, S., Xu, J. and Razeghi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 68, p. 2100 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Stevens, K.S., Kinniburgh, M. and Beresford, R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 66, p. 3518 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Asif Khan, M., Kuznia, J.N., Olson, D.T., Hove, J.M. and Blasingame, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 60, p. 2917 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Huang, Z.C., Mott, D.B. and Shu, P.K., Annual Device Research Conference Digest 1996, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 188189.Google Scholar
7. Asif Khan, M., Kuznia, J.N., Olson, D.T., Blasingame, M. and Bhattarai, A.R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, p. 2455 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Chen, Q., Asif Khan, M., Sun, C.J. and Yang, J.W., Electronics Letters, 31, p. 1781 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Walker, D., Zhang, X., Kung, P., Saxler, A., Xu, J. and Razeghi, M., MRS, 395, p. 955 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Khan, M.A., Shur, M.S., Chen, Q., Kuznia, J.N. and Sun, C.J., Electronics Letters, 31, p. 398 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Yuan, C., Salagaj, T., Stall, R. A., Li, Y., Schurman, M., Hwang, C. Y., Mayo, W. E., Lu, Y., Pearton, S. J., Krishnankutty, S. and Kolbas, R. M., J. Electrochem. Soc, 142, p. L163 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Saleh, B.E.A. and Teich, M.C., Fundamentals of Photonics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991, pp. 644692.Google Scholar
13. Lindley, W.T., Phelan, R.J. Jr., Wolfe, CM. and Foyt, A.G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 14, p. 197 (1969)Google Scholar