Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:01:35.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frictional behavior of C60 monolayer films on graphite (HOPG)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

S. Okita ,
A. Matsumuro  and
K. Miura
S. Okita
Affiliation:
Department of Microsystem Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
A. Matsumuro
Affiliation:
Department of Microsystem Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
K. Miura
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Aichi University of Education, Hirosawa 1, Igaya-cho, Kariya 448–8542, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The frictional behavior of a C60 monolayer film between graphite substrates is studied using a homebuilt surface force apparatus. The mean frictional force from the C60 monolayers is estimated to be approximately 2mN, which is one-fifth that of C60 thin films. The C60 monolayer films exhibit a low frictional force of 2mN up to one hundred scans under a normal stress of 8MPa, which indicates that the C60 monolayer film is highly promising for use as a lubricant. Key words, C60 monolayer film, Lubrication, Mechanical properties, Micromachines

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 750: Symposium Y – Surface Engineering 2002–Synthesis, Characterization and Applications , 2002 , Y8.30
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Lüthi, R., Meyer, E., Haefke, H., Howald, L., Gutmannsbauer, W., Güntherodt, H.-J., Science 266 (1994) 1979.Google Scholar
[2] Li, Z. Y., Surf. Sci. 441 (1999) 366.Google Scholar
[3] Matsumuro, A., Takada, Y., Takahashi, Y., Senoo, M., Kondo, I., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20 (1999) 1633.Google Scholar
[4] Lüthi, R., Haefke, H., Meyer, E., Hawald, L.. Lang, H.-P., Gerth, G., Güntherodt, H.-J., Z. Phys. B95 (1994) 1.Google Scholar
[5] Lüthi, R., Meyer, E., Haefke, H., Howald, H., Gutmannsbauer, W.. Guggisberg, M., Bammerlin, M., Güntherodt, H.-J., Surf. Sei. 338 (1995) 247.Google Scholar
[6] Schwarz, U.D., Allers, W., Gensterbium, G., Wiesendanger, R.; Phys. Rev B 52 (1995) 14967.Google Scholar
[7] Miura, K., Kamiya, S., Sasaki, N., unpublished.Google Scholar
[8] Israelachvili, J. N., Adams, G. E., Chem. Soc. J. Faraday Trans. 174 (1978) 975.Google Scholar
[9] Okita, S., Ishikawa, M., Miura, K., Surf. Sci. 442 (1999) L959.Google Scholar
[10] Okita, S., Ishikawa, M., Miura, K., Nano Letters 1(2001)101.Google Scholar
[11] Miura, K., Phys. Rev. B52 (1995) 78721.Google Scholar
[12] Miura, K., Maeda, K., Yamada, T., Materials Science Forum 239–241(1997) 663.Google Scholar
[13] Miura, K., Yamada, T., Ishikawa, M., Okita, S., Appl. Surf. Sci. 140(1999) 415.Google Scholar
[14] Gravil, P.A., Devel, M., Lambin, Ph., Bouju, X., Girard, Ch., Lucas, A.A., Phys Rev B53 (1996) 1622.Google Scholar