Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T02:22:04.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fracture Toughness and Subcritical Crack Growth in CVD Diamond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Kant
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Mineral Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1760
M. D. Drory
Affiliation:
Crystallume Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95054
R. O. Ritchie
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Mineral Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1760
Get access

Abstract

The fracture toughness, stress corrosion and cyclic fatigue properties of polycrystalline chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond have been investigated on thick (˜100 to 300 μm) free-standing films. Specifically, the fracture toughness, Kc, of diamond was determined using indentation methods and for the first time by the tensile testing of pre-notched fracture-mechanics type compact-tension samples. Measured Kc values were found to be between 5 and 7 MPa-m1/2 by either method and to be apparently independent of grain size and shape. Studies on subcritical crack growth (i.e., at stress intensities less than Kc) indicated that CVD diamond is essentially immune to stress-corrosion cracking under sustained loads in room air, water and acid environments. Corresponding experiments to examine susceptibility to cyclic fatigue are currently being performed using indentation-precracked cantilever beams cycled in three-point bending.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Field, J. E., ed., The Properties of Diamond (Academic Press, 1979).Google Scholar
2. Field, J. E., ed., The Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamond (Academic Press, 1992).Google Scholar
3. Drory, M. D., Gardinier, C. F. and Speck, J. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 3148 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Anstis, G. R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B. R. and Marshall, D. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Ponton, C. B. and Rawlings, R. D., Mater. Sci. Tech. 5, 865 (1989).Google Scholar
6. ASTM Standard E-399 “Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1993), vol.3.01, Section 3.Google Scholar
7. Drory, M. D., Dauskardt, R. H., Kant, A. and Ritchie, R. O., J. Appl. Phys. (Sept. 1995), in press.Google Scholar
8. Creager, M. and Paris, P. C., Int. J. Fract. Mech. 3, 247 (1967).Google Scholar
9. Cotterell, B. and Rice, J. R., Int. J. Fract. 16, 155 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Lawn, B. R., Fracture of Brittle Solids 2nd ed., (Cambridge University Press, Camabridge, U.K., 1993).Google Scholar
11. Dauskardt, R. H., Ritchie, R. O., Takemoto, J. K. and Brendzel, A. M., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28, 791 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Ager, J. W. and Drory, M. D., Phys. Rev. B 48, 2601 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Boppart, H., Straaten, J. van and Silvera, I. F., Phys. Rev. B 32, 1423 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Novikov, N. V. and Dub, S. N., J. Hard Mater. 2, 3 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Mecholsky, J. J., Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Diamond and Related Materials, Yoshikawa, M. et al., eds. (1992), p. 199.Google Scholar
16. O'Hern, M. E., McHargue, C. J., Clausing, R. E., Oliver, W. C. and Parrish, R. H., in Materials Research Society Extended Abstracts (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), EA-19, p. 131.Google Scholar
17. Drory, M. D. and Gardinier, C. F., J. Mater. Res. 7, 781 (1992).Google Scholar