Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:00:46.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fracture Modelling of Granular Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

E. Schlangen  and
J.G.M. Van Mier
E. Schlangen
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Stevin LaboratoryP.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
J.G.M. Van Mier
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Stevin LaboratoryP.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

A lattice type model is used for simulating fracture processes in concrete and sandstone. Two type of lattices were adopted: a regular triangular lattice and a random lattice. With both lattices the fracture process in four point shear specimens can be simulated. The results are in good agreement with experimental observations. With the regular lattice, where disorder is implemented via a generated grain structure, the typical failure mechanism for granular materials, crack face bridging, is retrieved. With the random lattice, these details cannot be simulated, but the macroscopic crack pattern is obtained correctly with an enormous decrease in the number of elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 278: Symposium W – Computational Methods in Materials Science , 1992 , 153
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Herrmann, H.J., in Random Fluctuations and Pattern Growth: Experiments and Models edited by Stanley, H.E. and Ostrowsky, N. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
2. Schlangen, E. and Van Mier, J.G.M., in Proc. Int'l. EPRI Conf. on Dam Fracture, edited by Saouma, V.E., Dungar, R. and Morris, D. (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, 1991), pp. 511–527.Google Scholar
3. Schlangen, E. and Van Mier, J.G.M., in Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. on Localized Damae” edited by Aliabadi, M.H., Brebbia, C.A., Cartwright, D.J. and Nisitani, H. (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1992), in print.Google Scholar
4. Mourzakel, C. and Herrmann, H.J., preprint HLRZ 1/92.Google Scholar
5. Burt, N.J. and Dougill, J.W., J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 103(3), 365–376 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Berg, G. and Svensson, U., Report TVSM-5050, Lund, 1991.Google Scholar
7. Bažant, Z.P., Tabbara, M.R., Kazemi, M.T. and Pijaudier-Cabot, G., J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(8), 1686–1705 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Bažant, Z.P. and Pfeiffer, P.A., Materials and Structures, 19 1986, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Davies, J., in Fracture Processes in Concrete, Rock and Ceramics, edited by Mier, J.G.M. van, Rots, J.G. and Bakker, A. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1991), pp. 717–726.Google Scholar
10. Van Mier, J.G.M., Schlangen, E. and Nooru-Mohamed, M.B., in Proc. FraMCoS I edited by Bažant, Z.P. (Elsevier Publishers, London, 1992), pp. 665–676.Google Scholar
11. Schlangen, E. and Van Mier, J.G.M., in Proc. FraMCoS I edited by Balant, Z.P. (Elsevier Publishers, London, 1992), pp. 677–682.Google Scholar
12. Van Mier, J.G.M., Cement & Concrete Research, 21(1), 1–15 (1991).Google Scholar