Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:31.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fractal Concepts And Aggregation Of Iron Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. Amal ,
J.A. Raper  and
T.D. Waite
R. Amal
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, School of Chemical Engineering, P.O. Box 1, NSW 2033, Australia.
J.A. Raper
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, School of Chemical Engineering, P.O. Box 1, NSW 2033, Australia.
T.D. Waite
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (A.N.S.T.O.), Private Mail Bag 1, Menai, NSW, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The modelling of the aggregation kinetics of iron oxides has been succesful in predicting the increase in aggregate size as determined by dynamic light scattering measurements. The aggregates were found to exhibit fractal behaviour with fractal dimensions obtained from the scattering exponent in static light scattering studies dependent on the aggregation mechanism and ranging from 2.3 for rapid (diffusion limited) to 2.8 for slow (reaction limited) aggregation. Polydispersity and restructuring of aggregates were found not to affect the relationship between scattering exponent and aggregate fractal dimension. Excellent correspondence over a range of temperatures and ionic strengths has been obtained between results of sizing experiments using dynamic light scattering and sizes predicted using a modified Smoluchowski model incorporating fractal dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 180: Symposium A – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV , 1990 , 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mandelbrot, B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature, (Freeman, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
2. Amal, R., Coury, J., Raper, J.A., Walsh, W.P. and Waite, T.D., Colloids and Surfaces, in press.Google Scholar
3. Amal, R., Raper, J.A. and Waite, T.D., J. Colloid and Interface Sci., in press.Google Scholar
4. Jullien, R. and Botet, R., Aggreation and Fractal Agregates, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).Google Scholar
5. Martin, J.E. and Hurd, A.J., J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 61 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Berne, B.I. and Pecora, R., Dynamic Light Scattering, (Wiley, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
7. Teixera, J., J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 781 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Chen, S.H. and Bendedouch, D., in Enzyme Structure Method in Enzymology, edited by Hirs, C.H.W. and Timasheff, S.N. (Academic, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
9. Teixera, J., in On Growth and Form, edited by Stanley, H.E. and Ostrowsky, N. (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986) pp. 145.Google Scholar
10. Chen, S.H. and Teixera, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2583 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Matijevic, E. and Scheiner, P., J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 6, 509 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Penners, N.H.G. and Koopal, L.K., Colloids and Surfaces 12, 337 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Amal, R., Coury, J.R., Raper, J.A. and Waite, T.D., in The Institution of Chemical Engineers 5th International Symposium on Agglomeration, 25–27 September 1989, Brighton Centre, UK.Google Scholar
14. Witten, T.A. and Sander, L.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Meakin, P., Phys. Rev. A 27, 1495 (1983).Google Scholar
16. Meakin, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1119 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Kolb, M., Botet, R. and Jullien, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1123 (1983).Google Scholar
18. Schaefer, D.W., Martin, J.E., Wiltzius, P. and Cannel, D.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2371 (1984).Google Scholar
19. Weitz, D.A., Huang, J.S., Lin, M.Y. and Sung, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1416 (1984).Google Scholar
20. Wilcoxon, J.P., Martin, J.E. and Schaefer, D.W., Phys. Rev. A 39,2675 (1988).Google Scholar
21. Aubert, C. and Cannel, D.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 738 (1986).Google Scholar
22. Martin, J.E., J. Appl. Cryst. 19, 25 (1986).Google Scholar