Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:39:00.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of Shallow P+ Junctions Using Two-Step Anneals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C.I. Drowley
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
J. Adkisson
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304 >Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
D. Peters
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
S.-Y. Chiang
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Get access

Abstract

Shallow (0.15-0.2 μm deep) p+ junctions have been formed using boron implanted into silicon which was pre-amorphized using a silicon implant. The implants were annealed using a two-step process; initially the wafers were furnace annealed at 600 °C for 100 min., followed by a rapid isothermal anneal (RIA) at 950-1100 °C for 10 sec. For comparison, some wafers were only given a single-step rapid isothermal anneal at 950-1100 °C for 10 sec. The shallowest junctions were formed when the amorphous silicon layer was deeper than the boron implant, because of the suppression of channelling. When the amorphous/crystalline interface was shallower than the tail of the boron implant, some channeling occurred. This channeling tail exhibited an enhanced diffusion during the single-step RIA which was reduced significantly by the two-step anneal. When the amorphous layer was deeper than the boron implant, the single-step and two-step anneals gave identical results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Seidel, T.E. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. EDL–4, 353 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Seidel, T.E., Knoell, R., Stevie, F.A., Poli, G., and Schwartz, B., in VLSI Science and Technology/1984, ed. by Bean, K.E. and Rozgonyi, G.A. (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1984) 201Google Scholar
3. Yamada, K., Kashiwagi, M., and Taniguchi, K., Proc. 14th Conf. (1982 International) on Solid State Devices, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 22, Suppl. 22-1, 157 (1983)Google Scholar
4. Sedgwick, T.O., Kalish, R., Mader, S.R., and Shatas, S.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 23, 293 (1984)Google Scholar
5. Sedgwick, T.O., Cohen, S.A., Oehrlein, G.S., Deline, V.R., Kalish, R., and Shatas, S., in VLSI Science and Technology/1984, ed. by Bean, K.E. and Rozgonyi, G.A., (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1984) 192 Google Scholar
6. Hodgson, R.T., Deline, V., Mader, S.M., Morehead, F.F., and Gelpey, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 23, 253 (1984)Google Scholar
7. Fair, R.B., Wortman, J.J, and Liu, J., International Electron Dev. Meeting Tech. Digest (IEEE, New York, 1983) 658 Google Scholar
8. Gat, A., AG Associates, private communication. See also ref. [5].Google Scholar
9. The SIMS measurements were performed at Charles Evans Associates.Google Scholar
10. Fair, R.B., Electrochem, J.. Soc. 122, 800 (1975)Google Scholar
11. McMillan, G.B., Shannon, J.M., and Ahmed, H., IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. EDL–5, 280 (1984)Google Scholar