Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:30:49.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of Metastable Structures and Amorphous Phases in cu-w Alloys Using the Triode Sputtering Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

H. F. Rizzo
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
L. E. Tanner
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
M. A. Wall
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
T. B. Massalski
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
E. D. McClanahan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The triode sputtering technique and a “split-target” arrangement were used to produce metastable crystalline and amorphous phases in the Cu-W system under essentially oxygen-free conditions. Large metastable extensions of solid solubility were observed both from the Cu (fcc) and W (bcc) sides of the phase diagram, and a wide range of metallic glass formation was observed, approximately between 30 and 65 at.% W. The thickness of the amorphous Cu-W phase (40–160 pm) that can be deposited without the formation of the metastable bcc phase appears to be dependent on the Cu-W alloy composition. On heating, the crystallization temperature of the amorphous alloys was higher than 350°C. The behavior of the lattice parameter and near-neighbor distance has been studied with x-ray diffraction, showing small positive deviations from an assumed Vegard's Law. Hardness measurements indicate that the metastable crystalline phases are relatively harder than the amorphous phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nastasi, M., Saris, F. W., Hung, L. S., and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys. 58 (8), 3052 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Laughlin, D. E., to be published in Bull. of Alloy Phase Diagrams.Google Scholar
3. Schafer, A. and Menzel, G., Thin Solid Films 52, 11 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Dirks, A. G. and van der Broek, J. J., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A3 (6), 2618 (1950).Google Scholar
5. Wang, Z. L., Westendrop, J. F. M., and Saris, F. W., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 209/210, 115 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Westendorp, Han, Wang, Zhong-Lie and Saris, Fran W., Nucl. Instr. and Methods 194, pp 453 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Rizzo, H. F., Massalski, T. B., and McClanahan, E. D., Trans. AIME, 19A, 5 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Rizzo, H. F., Massalski, T. B., and Echeverria, A. W., submitted to AIME Trans.Google Scholar
9. Rizzo, H. F., and Echeverria, A. W., J. Less Common Metals 121, 469 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Giessen, B. C. and Wagner, C. N. J., in Liquid Metals (Ed. Beer, S. Z.), M. Dekker, New York (1972), p. 654.Google Scholar
11. Davis, L. A., Chou, C. P., Tanner, L. E. and Ray, R., Scripta Metall. 10, 937 (1976).Google Scholar