Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T20:36:24.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation and Prevention of Chunky Graphite in Slowly Cooled Nodular Irons*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Tang Chong Xi ,
J. Fargues ,
M. Hecht  and
J. C. Margerie
Tang Chong Xi
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Technology, China
J. Fargues
Affiliation:
Centre Technique des Industries de la Fonderie, 12, avenue Raphaël –75016 PARIS, France.
M. Hecht
Affiliation:
Centre Technique des Industries de la Fonderie, 12, avenue Raphaël –75016 PARIS, France.
J. C. Margerie
Affiliation:
Centre Technique des Industries de la Fonderie, 12, avenue Raphaël –75016 PARIS, France.
Get access

Abstract

An experimental device has been designed in order to simulate the solidification of large castings by means of a small-sized sample (1 kg). Once the spheroidizing and inoculation processes have been completed, this sample is slowly cooled at controlled rate and under protective atmosphere in an insulated crucible placed in a laboratory resistance furnace. The maximum freezing time is about 90 min. These tests relate to a base iron having a good degree of purity.

SEM, optical microscopy and automated electron microprobe have been used for studying structure and mechanism of chunky graphite formation.

Results of over forty tests confirm several data abstracted from literature and provide some more information. For instance, there are different ways of preventing chunky graphite formation : acceleration of solidification, use of Ni-Mg or pure Mg as spheroidizers and, in any case, an antimony addition (0,02%).

A rather low carbon equivalent is also a favourable factor. However, for a given carbon equivalent, a final relatively high Si content improves graphite spheroidizing, chunky graphite appearing only if this content results from Fe-Si-Mg additions and/or from overinoculation.

Besides, confirmation is given of the detrimental effect of useless rare earth additions (e.g. 0,02%).

The matrix surrounding chunky graphite is on average more rich in Si than the one surrounding spheroidal graphite. An oxidizing etching reveals that chunky eutectic has formed at first.

Aiming an interpretation of the results, structure examination keeps going on, in order to find out if there could be several kinds of chunky graphite.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 34: Symposium – Physical Metallurgy of Cast Iron , 1984 , 67
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Work carried out in the laboratory of the Centre Technique des Industries de la Fonderie.

References

REFERENCES

1. Karsay, S.I. and Campomanes, E., AFS Transactions 78, 85–92 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Barton, R., Int. Congress, Prague (1971).Google Scholar
3. Mayer, M. H., Hommes et Fonderie 38, 40–48 (1973).Google Scholar
4. Horsfall, M.A., BCIRA, unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
5. Karsay, S.I., Ductile iron (Quebec Iron and Titanium Corporation 1974).Google Scholar
6. Campomanes, E., AFS Transactions 79, 57–62 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Moore, W.H., Casting Engineering and Foundry World, 42–50 (Fall 1982).Google Scholar
8. Buhr, R.K., AFS Transactions 76, 497–503 (1968).Google Scholar
9. Barton, R., BCIRA Journal 9, 668–686 (1961).Google Scholar
10. Okada, S. and Mafbashi, Y., Imono 43, 649–658 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Church, N.L. and Schelleng, R.D., AFS Transactions 78, 5–8 (1970).Google Scholar
12. Strizik, P. and Jeglitsch, F., AFS Int. Cast Metals-Journal 1, 3, 23–30 (1976).Google Scholar
13. Riding, A. and Gruzleski, J.E., AFS Cast Metals Research Journal 7, 2, 67–69 (1971).Google Scholar
14. Thury, W., AFS Cast Metals Research Journal 10, 3, 134–137 (1974).Google Scholar
15. Liu, P.C., Li, C.L., Wu, D.H., Loper, C.R. Jr, AFS Transactions 91, 119–126 (1983).Google Scholar
16. Karsay, S.I. and Schelleng, R.D., AFS Transactions 69, 672–679 (1961).Google Scholar
17. Graham, P.S., AFS Transactions 90, 313–322 (1982).Google Scholar
18. Horie, H et al, Imono 55, 1, 27–32 (1983).Google Scholar