Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:11:44.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluorophore Conformation in Green Fluorescent Protein: A Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Steven Trohalaki ,
Soumya S. Patnaik  and
Ruth Pachter
Steven Trohalaki
Affiliation:
The Anteon Corporation, 5100 Springfield Pike, Dayton, OH 45431-1231
Soumya S. Patnaik
Affiliation:
The Anteon Corporation, 5100 Springfield Pike, Dayton, OH 45431-1231
Ruth Pachter
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials & Manufacturing Directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7702
Get access

Abstract

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) is a widely used fluorescent marker exhibiting two excitation peaks – a strong peak at 398 nm and a second at 475 nm, with the fluorescence at ca. 510 nm. Its molecular structure consists of a β-barrel composed of 11 β-strands and a central helix containing the fluorophore. Two different forms of the fluorophore – a protonated/neutral fluorophore and a de-protonated/anionic fluorophore – are thought to be responsible for the two distinct spectroscopic states. Notably, the isolated fluorophore in solution is efficiently quenched. Conformational flexibility within the protein cavity is an implicitly important factor that governs the photochemistry of GFP. However, the literature contains accounts of studies that reach conflicting conclusions, claiming that either the fluorophore's barrier to internal rotation is negligibly small or that the protein cavity is not complementary to a planar fluorophore. In this work, we calculate the torsional potential of one of the two exocyclic bonds that connect the two rings in the fluorophore, taking into account its immediate environment by applying a quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics method, with the ultimate aim of evaluating the protein-environment effects on the fluorescence.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 826: Symposium V – Proteins as Materials , 2004 , V2.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zimmer, M., Chem Rev. 102, 759 (2002).Google Scholar
2. S, &Kirkpatrick, M., Naik, R.R., and Stone, M.O., J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 2867 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Pikas, D.J., S, & Kirkpatrick, M., Tewksbury, E., Brott, L.L., Naik, R.R., Stone, M.O., and Dennis, W.M., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4831 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Brejc, K., Sixma, T.K., Kitts, P.A., Kain, S.R., Tsien, R.Y., Ormo, M., and Remington, S.J., PNAS USA 94, 2306 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Chen, M.C., Lambert, C.R., Urgitis, J.D., and Zimmer, M., Chem. Phys. 270, 157 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Niwa, H., Inouye, S., Hirano, T., Matsuno, T., and Kojima, S., PNAS USA 53, 13617 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Creemers, T.M.H., Lock, A.J., Subramanian, V., Jovin, T.M., and Völker, S., Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 557 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Marques, M.M., Lopez, X., Varsano, D., Castro, A., and Rubio, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(25), 258101 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Voityuk, A.A., Michel-Beyerle, M.-E., and Rosch, N., Chem. Phys, Lett. 296, 269 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Patnaik, S.S., Trohalaki, S., and Pachter, R. (work in progress).Google Scholar
11. Maseras, F. and Morokuma, K., J. Comp. Chem. 16, 1170 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Gaussian 03, Revision B.05, Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2003.Google Scholar
13. Vreven, T. and Morokuma, K., J. Comp. Chem. 21, 1419 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Rappé, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A. III, and Skiff, W. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10024 (1992).Google Scholar
15. NBO Version 3.1, Glendening, E. D., Reed, A. E., Carpenter, J. E., and Weinhold, F..Google Scholar