Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:32:56.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flowing Afterglow Synthesis of Polymer Films with Nonlinear Optical Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Peter Haaland  and
Hao Jiang
Peter Haaland
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory Materials Directorate, WL/MLPJ, WPAFB, OH 45433
Hao Jiang
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory Materials Directorate, WL/MLPJ, WPAFB, OH 45433
Get access

Abstract

Extensively conjugated polymer films with excellent morphology, homogeneity, robustness, and nonlinear optical coefficients have been synthesized in the flowing afterglow of a lowpressure argon plasma. Polymers of benzene, thiophene, furan, and napthalene are among the systems studied. The polymers, which grow by accretion of positive ions through a low-voltage sheath, have bulk and surface textures which scale systematically with film thickness. The hopes and perils of employing these new materials as active elements in gradient-index reflectors and optical switches will be described, as will the link between morphology and deposition mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 374: Symposia ZB – Materials for Optical Limiting , 1994 , 123
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Halvorson, C. et al., Science, 265, 1215 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Yang, L., et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,6, 753, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Boyd, G., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6,685 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Tutt, L. and Bogess, T., Prog. Quant. Elecht., 17, 299 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Sheik-Bahae, M., Hagan, D., and Van Stryland, E., Phys. Rev. Lett.,65,96 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Sension, R., et al., J. Phys. Client., 195,6075 (1991).Google Scholar

7 Monsour, K., Soileau, M., and Van Stryland, E., J. Opt. Soc. B, 9, 1100 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Skotheim, T., ed., Handbook of Conducting Polymers, (Dekker:New York) 1986.Google Scholar

9 Hernandez, R., Diaz, A.F., Waltman, R., and Bargon, J., J. Phys. Chem., 88, 3333 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Tanaka, K. et al., Synthetic Metals, 38, 107 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Thomas, B., Pillai, M., and Jayalekshmi, S., J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., 21, 503 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Haaland, p. and Targove, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 61, 34 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Kutsche, C., Haaland, P., and Targove, J., J. Appl. Phys., 73, 2602, (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Xia, T., Said, A., Hagan, D., and Van Stryland, E., personal communication, January 1994.Google Scholar

15 Park Scientific Instruments scanning probe microscope with 10×10×2 um scan head.Google Scholar

16 Hitachi S-900 low voltage, high resolution, field emission SEM.Google Scholar

17 Mullins, W. and Sekerka, R., J. Appl. Phys., 34, 323 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Vicsek, T., Fractal Growth Phenomena, (Singapore:World) 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar