Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:11.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flexural Strength and Fracture Properties of a Fly Ash Blended Cement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. Chanda  and
J. E. Bailey
S. Chanda
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Surrey Guildford Surrey UK
J. E. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Surrey Guildford Surrey UK
Get access

Abstract

The flexural strength, fracture toughness and Young's Modulus of an ordinary Portland cement plus 25 wt% fly ash paste (FACP) were compared with those of a control paste (HCP) at times ranging from one day to one year. At comparatively early times these properties develop more slowly in FACP. However, at comparatively late ages, e.g. ten months, FACP showed improvements over HCP for all of these properties. A complicating factor is that for both FACP and HCP, the flexural strength and toughness show maxima and the “crossover” times for the various properties differ. This paper analyses these results in terms of the observed fracture mechanism for HCP by taking into account the changes brought about in the microstructure of FACP, due to the incorporation of fly ash.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 43: Symposium M – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products I , 1984 , 107
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Owens, P.L., Concrete 13(7) 21–26 (July, 1979).Google Scholar
2. Bennett, K., Chem. and Ind. 829–834 (6 November, 1982).Google Scholar
3. Dalziel, J.A., 7th Int.Cong. on “The Chemistry of Cement” at Paris, Vol.III, 93–97 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Owens, P.L. and Buttler, F.G., 7th Int.Cong. on “The Chemistry of Cement” at Paris, Vol.III, 60–65 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Berry, E.E. and Malhotra, V.M., ACI Journal 77(8), 59–73 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Kendall, K., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A361, 245–263 (1978).10.1098/rspa.1978.0101Google Scholar
7. Shiyuan, Huang, “Hydration of Fly Ash Cement and Microstructure of Fly Ash Cement Pastes”, CBI Research No. 2 (1981), Swedish Cement & Concrete Research Institute.Google Scholar
8. Brown, W.F. and Srawley, J.E., ASTM STP 410, Philadelphia (1967).Google Scholar
9. Alford, N.McN., Groves, G.W. and Double, O.D., Cem. Concr. Res. 12,349–358 (1982).10.1016/0008-8846(82)90083-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Higgins, D.D. and Bailey, J.E., J.Mater.Sci. 11, 1995–2003 (1976).10.1007/PL00020325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Brown, J.H. and Pomeroy, C.D., Cem. Concr. Res. 3, 475–480 (1973).10.1016/0008-8846(73)90085-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Diamond, S., Proc.Conf. on “Hydraulic Cement Pastes: Their Structure and Properties”, (Cem. Concr. Assoc., UK) at Sheffield, 2–30 (1976).Google Scholar
13. Entin, Z.B., Kuznetsova, T.V., Dmitriev, A.M. and Lepershenkova, G.G., Int.Symp. on “The Use of PFA in Concrete” at Leeds, 95–100 (1982).Google Scholar
14. Chanda, S. and Bailey, J.E., Unpublished work.Google Scholar