Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:59:04.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First-principles investigation of the conductive filament configuration in rutile TiO2-x ReRAM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2012

Liang Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 420 Via Palou Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
Seong-Geon Park
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 420 Via Palou Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
Blanka Magyari-Köpe
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 420 Via Palou Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
Yoshio Nishi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 420 Via Palou Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The interactions and ordering of oxygen vacancies in rutile TiO2 were thoroughly investigated by density functional calculations to search for atomic configurations of the conductive filament. As random isolated vacancies could not support the low-resistance state conduction in TiO2 ReRAM, vacancy ordering was introduced in [110] and [001] directions of the lattice to study the electronic structures. The calculation results revealed that a di-vacancy chain in [001] direction makes the electrons delocalized in that direction, which is identified as a possible configuration of the conductive filament. This low-resistance state can be effectively disrupted by moving oxygen vacancies out of the filament to reach high-resistance states.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Magyari-Köpe, B., Tendulkar, M., Park, S.-G., Lee, H. D. and Nishi, Y., Nanotechnology 22, 254249 (2011).Google Scholar
2. Park, S.-G., Magyari-Köpe, B., and Nishi, Y., VLSI Tech. Symp Tech. Dig., 46 (2011).Google Scholar
3. Sawa, A., Materials Today 11, 2836 (2008).Google Scholar
4. Akinaga, H. and Shima, H., Proceedings of the IEEE 98, 22372251 (2010).Google Scholar
5. Szot, K., Rogala, M., Speier, W., Klusek, Z., Besmehn, A. and Waser, R., Nanotechnology 22, 254001(2011).Google Scholar
6. Kresse, G. and Joubert, D., Phys. Rev. B 59, 17581775 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B 49, 1425114269 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Anisimov, V. I., Aryasetiawan, F. and Lichtenstein, A. I., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 767808 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Park, S.-G., Magyari-Köpe, B., and Nishi, Y., Phys. Rev. B 82, 115109 (2010).Google Scholar
10. Becke, A. D. and Edgecombe, K. E., J. Chem. Phys. 92, 53975403 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Park, S.-G., Magyari-Köpe, B., and Nishi, Y., IEEE Electron Device Letters 32, 197(2011).Google Scholar
12. Kwon, D.-H., Kim, K. M., Jang, J. H., Jeon, J. M., Lee, M. H., Kim, G. H., Li, X.-S., Park, G.-S., Lee, B., Han, S., Kim, M. and Hwang, C. S., Nat. Nanotech. 5, 148153 (2010).Google Scholar