Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:27:07.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Figures of Merit for Electrically Conductive Polymer Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Jaime C. Grunlan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota 151 Amundson Hall, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
William W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota 151 Amundson Hall, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Lorraine F. Francis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota 151 Amundson Hall, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In an effort to determine the optimal balance of electrical and mechanical performance for electrically conductive polymer composites, three figures of merit were evaluated. All three figures of merit displayed peaks and/or discontinuities at a particular filler loading. These loadings appear to correspond to the critical pigment volume concentration for a given system. Composite systems based upon latex as the matrix starting material showed peaks in the figures of merit at very low carbon black concentrations (10 vol%), while composites prepared with polymer solutions or melts had peaks above 20 vol% carbon black. These differences in behavior are attributed to differences in microstructural evolution that occur with filler loading.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gordon, R. G., MRS Bull., 25, 52 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Broms, P., Birgerson, J. and Salaneck, W. R., Synth. Met., 88, 255 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Tressler, J. F., Alkoy, S., Dogan, A. and Newnham, R. E., Composites Part A, 30, 477 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Wang, L., Zhu, J., Zou, X. and Zhang, F., Sens. Actuators, B66, 266 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Sakamoto, W. K., Shibatta-Kagesawa, S. T. and Melo, W. L. B., Sens. Actuators, A77, 28 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Fuflyigin, V., Salley, E., Osinsky, A. and Norris, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 3075 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Yi, X. S., Wu, G. and Ma, D., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 67, 131 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Tang, H., Chen, X., Tang, A. and Luo, Y., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 59, 383 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Grunlan, J. C., Gerberich, W. W. and Francis, L. F., J. Mater. Res., 14, 4132 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Grunlan, J. C., Gerberich, W. W. and Francis, L. F., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., (in press).Google Scholar
11. Asbeck, W.K., and VanLoo, M., Ind. Eng. Chem., 41, 1470 (1949).Google Scholar