Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T07:58:28.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fiber Reinforced Alkali Activated Blended Cement Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

M. R. Silsbee
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
D. Wolfe-Confer
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
D. M. Roy
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Get access

Abstract

Recently there has been renewed interest in the use of alkali activation to increase the rate of strength development in blended cements. The objective of this study was to examine the advantages-disadvantages of using alkali activated blended cement materials with fiber reinforcing. There are advantages of the rapid set for certain applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Majumdar, A.J., pp. 4868 in Proc. RILEM Symp. “Fibre Reinforced Cement and Concrete”, Neville, A. (Ed.), The Construction Press, (1975).Google Scholar
2) Ohama, Y., Amano, M. and Endo, M., “Properties of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Cement with Silica Fume,” Con. Int. March, (1985).Google Scholar
3) Shah, S., “Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Con. Int. 81–82 March (1990).Google Scholar
4) Hannant, D.J., Fiber Cements and Fiber Concretes John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1978).Google Scholar
5) Akihama, S., Suenaga, T., and Nakagawa, H., “Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reiforced Cement Composites and Their Application to Buildings,” MRS Int'l. Mtg. on Adv. Mats. 13 139156 (1989)Google Scholar
6) Lassinger, R., “A Comparative Study of Fiber Reinforced Chemically Bonded Ceramics,” Senor Thesis in Ceramic Science, The Pennsylvania Stae University, (1990).Google Scholar
7) Leonard, S. and Bentur, A., “Improvement of the Durability of Glass Fiber Reinforced Cement Using Blended Cement Matrix,” Cem. Con. Res. 14 717728 (1984).Google Scholar
8) Mills, R.H., “Age-Embrittlement of Glass-Reinforced Concrete Containing Blastfurnace Slag,”, Cem. Con. Res. 11 421428 (1981).Google Scholar
9) Heitsmann, R.F., Fitzgerald, M. and Sawyer, J.L., U.S. Patent No. 4,642,137 Feb. 10, 1987.Google Scholar
10 ) W., Xuequan, Weimin, J. and Roy, D.M., “Early Activation of Slag Cement,” Cem. Con. Res. 20 961974 (1990).Google Scholar
11) Roy, D.M. and Silsbee, M.R., ”New Rapid Setting Alkali Activated Cement Compositions,” in Specialty Cements With Advanced Properties (Materials Research Society Symp. Proc.) (1990) in press.Google Scholar
12) Zheng, Q. and Chung, D.D.L., “Carbon Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites Improved by Using Chemical Agents,” MRS Int'l. Mtg. on Adv. Mats. 13 179184 (1989)Google Scholar
13) Ambroise, J., Dejean, J., and Pera, J., “Study of Fiber Matrix Interfaces in Metakaolinite-OPC Blended Cement GRC Composites,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 114 175180 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar