Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T18:00:24.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feature Size and Density Effects in Wet Selective Etching of GaAs/AlAs p-HEMT Structures with Organic Acid - Peroxide Solutions.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Vinay S. Kulkarni
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell, MA, USA.
Kanti Prasad
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell, MA, USA.
William Quinn
Affiliation:
Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA.
Frank Spooner
Affiliation:
Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA.
Changmo Sung
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell, MA, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Pseudomorphic HEMT (p-HEMT) devices are used in a number of wireless communication applications including power amplifiers in the 17–50 GHz range, low noise amplifiers and switches. Selective wet etching is often used to form the gate regions of these devices to avoid plasma damage associated with dry etching. We have investigated the wet etching of small (8μm to 0.5μm) features with organic acid - hydrogen peroxide solutions. Two acid solutions were used as a selective etchant for GaAs using AlAs etch stop layers in a p-HEMT structure grown by MBE. The etched features were characterized by AFM, SEM, and TEM techniques. The etch depth uniformity and reproducibility were found to depend on a number of factors including feature size, feature density, etching chemistry, agitation and surface tension. When features with a range of size and density were placed in close proximity in a layout we found that the etch rate of the different features was a function of density, size and most importantly the etch chemistry. One etchant solution exhibited a 12% difference in etch rate from the smallest feature to the largest, while another solution exhibited uniform etching of all features regardless of size or density. Both solutions produced specular etched surfaces in GaAs and AlGaAs. However, the AlAs etch stop showed a non-uniform surface morphology after etching. The surface morphology of the AlAs etch stop is one factor that limits the over etch which can be designed into the process. The most important factors to be considered in designing a selective etch process will be presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Danzilio, D. and Hanson, A., GaAs MANTECH, 143145 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Broekaert, T., and Fonstand, C., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 39, No.3, 533536 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Merritt, S. and Dagenais, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.140, No. 9, L138 – L139 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Schmukler, B., Brunemeier, P., Hitchens, W., Cantos, B., Strifler, W., Rosenblatt, D., Remba, R., GaAs IC Symposium, 325328 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Williams, R., “Modern GaAs Processing Methods”, (Artech House Inc, Boston, London, 1990) p. 95.Google Scholar