Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:00:06.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fe-42%Ni austenitic alloy as a novel substrate for flexible electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2011

Xiaoxiao Ma ,
Shahrukh A. Khan ,
Nackbong Choi ,
Miltiadis Hatalis  and
Mark Robinson
Xiaoxiao Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Shahrukh A. Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Nackbong Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Miltiadis Hatalis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Mark Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

We report Fe-42%Ni as a novel high-performance substrate for a-IGZO TFT fabrication after evaluating 8 different metals for chemical compatibility, mechanical flexing and dimensional stability. Excellent flexibility and rollability indicates that Fe-42%Ni would be a good choice as flexible substrate for R2R process. Pre-annealing process for stabilizing the substrate is studied and applied to the Fe-42%Ni foil before TFT fabrication. Staggered bottom gate a-IGZO TFTs which were fabricated on this substrate have field effect mobility of 12 cm2/V.s, threshold voltage of 2V, sub-threshold swing of 0.6V/decade and on/off current ratio exceeding 107.

Keywords

devicesalloythin film
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1285: Symposium D – Challenges in Roll-to-Roll (R2R) Fabrication for Electronics and Other Functionalities , 2011 , mrsf10-1285-d06-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Theiss, S. D. and Wagner, S., IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 17, 578–580, (1996)Google Scholar
[2] Lemmi, F., Chung, W., Lin, S., Smith, P. M., Sasagawa, T., Drews, B. C., Hua, A., Stern, J. R., and Chen, J. Y., IEEE Electron Device Lett., VOL. 25, 486–488, (2004)Google Scholar
[3] Crawford, G. P., Flexible Panel Displays, John Wiley and Sons, (2005)Google Scholar
[4] Howwell, R. S. and Hatalis, M. K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 149(2), G143–G146, (2002)Google Scholar
[5] Kuo, P.C., Jamshidi-Roudbari, A., and Hatalis, M., App. Phy. Lett. 91, 243507, (2007)Google Scholar
[6] Khan, S. A. and Hatalis, M.K., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 1109, (2009)Google Scholar
[7] Boljanovic, V., Sheet metal forming processes and die design, Industrial Press Inc., (2004)Google Scholar
[8] Ma, X. and Hatalis, M.K., poster presented at FlexTech 2010 Conference, Pheonix, AZ Google Scholar
[9] Lement, B. S., Averbach, B. L. and Cohen, Morris, Transactions of the American Society for Metals, Vol.XLIII, 171–196, (1951)Google Scholar
[10] Jamshidi-Roudbari, A., Khan, S.A., Hatalis, M.K., IEEE Electron Device Lett., 31, 320 (2010).Google Scholar