Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T23:28:46.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Failure Modes of Metal Interfaces: Experimental Evidence Relating to the Effect of Chemical Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. D. Pashley
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, England.
J. B. Pethica
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, England.
Get access

Abstract

The strength of an interface between two metal surfaces can be drastically affected by the presence of chemical species in the interface. The two surfaces may form the boundary between two grains inside a solid block of metal, the interface between a substrate and a metal film or the interface between two solid bodies brought into physical contact. Interface impurities such as oxygen atoms generally reduce the cohesion between the two surfaces. Conventional fracture experiments have difficulty in determining whether this results from a reduction in the interfacial energy, or a hardening of the interface, either of these making brittle fracture easier. The experiments which we have carried out by contacting two clean and characterised surfaces in ultra high vacuum, enable a direct study to be made of the change in interfacial energy and mechanical behaviour as a result of adsorbed species.

A sharp metal point of about 1μm radius of curvature is contacted against a flat metal specimen and the force of adhesion and contact area (measured from electrical resistance) are determined. The extent of ductile or elastic behaviour of the interface can be determined from the reversibility of the contact area as a function of applied load during separation.

We have shown directly from a contact experiment, that monolayer quantities of oxygen reduce the interfacial energy by a factor of three in the metal contacts studied. Interfacial ductility is only reduced by the presence of oxide layers of the order of 5nm thick.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Muller, V. M., Yushchenko, V.S. and Derjaguin, B. V., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 77, 91 (1980)Google Scholar
[2] Pashley, M. D., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, (1982)Google Scholar
[3] Pashley, M. D. and Tabor, D., Vacuum 31, 619 (1981)Google Scholar
[4] Pashley, M. D., Pethica, J. B. and Tabor, D., Wear 100, 7 (1984)Google Scholar
[5] Pethica, J. B. and Tabor, D., Surface Sci. 89, 182 (1979)Google Scholar
[6] Barquins, M. and Maugis, D., J. Mechanique theorique et appliquee 1, 331 (1982)Google Scholar
[7] Hondros, E. D. and McLean, D., Phil. Mag. 29, 771 (1974)Google Scholar
[8] Seah, M. P., Acta Met. 28, 955 (1980)Google Scholar
[9] Kumar, A. and Eyre, B. L., Proc. R. Soc. A 370, 431 (1980)Google Scholar