Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:00:14.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors for Controlling Martensitic Transformation Temperature of TiNi Shape Memory Alloy by Addition of Ternary Elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Hideki Hosoda ,
Kenji Wakashima ,
Shuichi Miyazaki  and
Kanryu Inoue
Hideki Hosoda
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226–8503, Japan.
Kenji Wakashima
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226–8503, Japan.
Shuichi Miyazaki
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8573, Japan.
Kanryu Inoue
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195–2120, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Correlations between the changes in martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms) by addition of ternary elements X and several factors of the ternary additions were investigated for TiNi shape memory alloy. The change of Ms by addition of 1mol%X is referred to as ΔMs (in K/mol%), and ΔMs was systematically evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry experimentally using (Ti, X)50Ni50 solution-treated at 1273K for 3.6ks where the Ni content was kept constant to be 50mol%. The ternary additions X investigated are the transition metal (TM) elements selected from 4th period group (Zr, Hf) to 10th period group (Pd, Pt). The factors investigated are (1) the number of total outer d- and s-electrons (Nele), and electron hole number (NV), (2) electronegativity (EN), (3) atomic volume (VX) and (4) Mendeleev number (NM). It was found that the values of ΔMs are different even in a same period group; ΔMs of 6th period group are -133K/mol%Cr (3d-TM), -152K/mol%Mo (4d-TM) and -64K/mol%W (5d-TM) for example. The results found in the correlations between ΔMs and those factors are summarized as follows. (1) ΔMs depends on Nele and NV. However, the data are scattered because same Nele and NV are often given in a same period group. Then, other factors than Nele and NV are required for clear understanding of ΔMs. (2) ΔMs seems to become lowered slightly with increasing EN. (3) ΔMs weakly depends on atomic volume VX. Ternary addition with large VX increases ΔMs slightly, and with small VX decreases ΔMs largely. Since the stress field must be formed by substitution due to size mismatch, the type of stress field, tension/compression, may be an important role to determine the sign of ΔMs. (4) ΔMs shows a good correlation with NM as -9.4Kmol%−1/ΔNM where ΔNM is the difference in NM. This suggests that a ternary alloying element with smaller (larger) NM stabilizes the B19’ martensite (B2 parent) phase. Effect of site occupancy on Ms is also discussed only for Cr.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 842: Symposium S – Integrative and Interdisciplinary Aspects of Intermetallics , 2004 , S3.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stachowiak, G. B. and McCormick, P. G., Acta Metall., 36, 291 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Eckelmeyer, K. H., Scripta Metall., 10, 667 (1976).Google Scholar
3. Tang, W., Sundman, B., Sandström, R. and Qiu, C., Acta Metall., 47, 3457–3468 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Wang, F. E., Proc. First Conf. on Fracture, BII–103 (1965).Google Scholar
5. Honma, T., Matsumoto, M., Shugo, Y., Nishida, M. and Yamazaki, I., TITANIUM’80 Science and Technology, ed. Izumi, O., 2, 1455 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Hosoda, H., Fukui, T., Inoue, K., Mishima, Y. and Suzuki, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 459, 287 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Hosoda, H., Hanada, S., Inoue, K., Mishima, Y. and Suzuki, T., Intermetallics, 6, 291 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Humbeek, J. V. and Firstov, G., The Fourth Pacific Rim Intl. Conf. On Advanced Materials Processing (PRICM-4), eds. Hanada, S. et al., Jpn. Inst. Metals, 2, 1871 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Khachin, V. N., Pushin, V. G., Sivokha, V. P., Kondrat'yev, V.V., Muslov, S. A., Voronin, V. P., Zolotukhin, Yu. S. and Yurchenko, L. I., Phys. Met. Metall., 67, 125 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Takahashi, Y., Tsuji, M., Sakurai, J., Hosoda, H., Wakashima, K. and Miyazaki, S., Trans. MRS-J., 28, 627 (2003), Phys. Met. Metall., 29, 3005 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Hosoda, H., Tsuji, M., Mimura, M., Takahashi, Y., Wakashima, K. and Yamabe-Mitarai, Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 753, BB5.51.1 (2003)Google Scholar
12. Hosoda, H., Tsuji, M., Takahashi, Y., Inamura, T., Wakashima, K., Yamabe-Mitarai, Y., Miyazaki, S. and Inoue, K., Mater. Sci. Forum, 426–432, 2333 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Hosoda, H., Mizuuchi, K. and Inoue, K., Intl. Symp. Microsystems, Intelligent Materials & Robots, eds. Tani, J. and Esashi, M., 7th Sendai Intl. Symp., 231 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Sims, C. T., Superalloys II, eds. Sims, C. T. et al., Chapter 8, 217 (John Wiley & Sons, 1987).Google Scholar
15. Hosoda, H., Inoue, K., Enami, K. and Kamio, A., J. Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 7, 312 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Hosoda, H., Sugimoto, T., Ohkubo, K., Miura, S., Mohri, T. and Miyazaki, S., Intl. J. Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 12, 3 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Pettifor, D. G., Mater. Sci. Technol., 4, 2480 (1988).Google Scholar
18. Pettifor, D. G., Intermetallic Compounds, eds. Westbrook, J. H. and Fleischer, R. L., 1, Chapter 18, (John Wiley & Sons, 1995) p.419.Google Scholar
19. Nakata, Y., Tadaki, T. and Shimizu, K., Mat. Trans., JIM, 32, 580 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Pauling, L.. The Nature of Chemical Bond, third edition, (Cornell Univ. Press, 1960).Google Scholar
21. Brookes, M. E. and Smith, R. W., Met. Sci. J., 2, 181 (1968).Google Scholar