Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:44:47.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facet Formation on One-Dimensionally, Periodic Si Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D.P. Adams
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, 2300 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109–2136
S.M. Yalisove
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, 2300 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109–2136
Get access

Abstract

The development of surface morphology during homoepitaxial growth on one-dimensionally periodic, patterned Si substrates and subsequent annealing has been investigated using transmission electron Microscopy. Si layers grown by MBE are characterized in terms of facets which develop at a trench edge. 1000 Å thick films deposited at ∼ 600°C on Si substrates develop large (311) facets at the bottom and top of the sidewall. After annealing at high temperatures for short times (∼ 1 hour), the amplitude of corrugation decreases but the surface profile is facetted along its length. The “annealed shape” at the trench edge is shown to consist of several surfaces including: (211), (311), (511), and (711). This evidence suggests that (311) facets develop as a result of the growth kinetics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Li, W.Q. and Bhattacharya, P.K., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 12, 385 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Phaneuf, R.J. and Williams, E.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2563 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Schrott, A.G. and Blakely, J.M., Surf. Sci. Lett. 150, L77 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Umbach, C.C., Keefe, M.E., and Blakely, J.M., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 1014 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gibson, J.M., McDonald, M.L., and Unterwald, F.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1765 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Booker, G.R. and Unvala, B.A., Phil. Mag. A 11, 11 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Salisbury, L.G. and Huxford, N.P., Phil. Mag. Lett. 56, 35 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bird, D.M., Clarke, L.J., King-Smith, R.D., Payne, M.C., Stich, I., and Sutton, A.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3785 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Chadi, D.J., Phys. Rev. B 29, 785 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ishizaka, A. and Shiraki, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 66 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yang, Y-N. and Williams, E.D., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 8, 2481 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Guha, S. and Madhukar, A., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 8662 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Eaglesham, D.J., White, A.E., Feldman, L.C., Monya, N., and Jacobson, D.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1643 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Olshanetsky, B.Z. and Mashanov, V.I., Surf. Sci. 111, 414 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 333 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ozdemir, M. and Zangwill, A., Phys. Rev. B 42, 5013 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rettori, A. and Villain, J., J. Phys. France 49, 257 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar