Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:41:12.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Fabrication of NiSi2/Si(100) Interfaces with Controlled Morphologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J. P. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Univ. of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Materials Science, Philadelphia, PA 19104
R. T. Tung
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
F. Schrey
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
W. R. Graham
Affiliation:
Univ. of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Materials Science, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

The morphology and defect structures associated with thin NiSi2 films prepared on Si(100) were investigated. Facets were found to be a common defect structure at the interface unless stoichiometric co-deposition of Ni and Si was performed. Annealing thin, uniform NiSi2 layers prepared by stoichiometric co-deposition to temperatures ≥ 700°C yielded epitaxial films of high crystalline perfection. Films in which the deposition was off-stoichiometric exhibited a variety of defect structures. In addition to facets at the interface, networks of meandering micro-twins or stacking faults were observed in highly Ni-rich films, while pinholes were observed in Si-rich films. Facets at the interface were found to be eliminated by annealing at temperatures ≥ - 750°C, indicating that the planar NiSi2/Si(100) interface is energetically stable with respect to the formation of NiSi2(111) facets. Through manipulation of the film growth kinetics, NiSi2/Si(100) interfaces with arbitrary facet densities were produced. Partially faceted NiSi2/Si(100) interfaces represent ideal experimental systems for revealing the effects of Schottky barrier inhomogeneity on the electrical measurements of metal/semiconductor contacts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chiu, K. C. R., Poate, J. M., Rowe, J. E., Sheng, T. T., and Cullis, A. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 988 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Batstone, J. L., Gibson, J. M., Tung, R. T., and Levi, A. F. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 828 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Sullivan, J. P., Tung, R. T., and Schrey, F., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 478 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Tung, R. T., Levi, A. F. J., Sullivan, J. P., and Schrey, F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 72 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Ishizaki, A. and Shiraki, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 666 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Tabe, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 534 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Gibson, J. M. and Batstone, J. L., Surf. Sci. 208, 317 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Eaglesham, D. J., Tung, R. T., Sullivan, J. P., and Schrey, F., to be published.Google Scholar
9. Tung, R. T. and Schrey, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 256 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Tung, R. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2821 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 45, 13509 (1992);Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P., Tung, R. T., Pinto, M. R., and Graham, W. R., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 7403 (1991).Google Scholar